Snooks
Olympic Champion Keely
Posts: 53,625
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 281
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2015 09:29 by Snooks.)
|
|
01-11-2015 09:26 |
|
Manuel
I'd marry H. Lola in a heartbeat
Posts: 547
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 14
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
(01-11-2015 17:11 )Joey 27 Wrote: (01-11-2015 06:17 )trevor format Wrote: (01-11-2015 02:11 )Joey 27 Wrote: Michelle Thorne if they wanted to go to BS
Babestation would definitely sign Michelle Thorne, if such a thing was possible. You can be sure of that.
Yes silly me i forget its all about call stats and money, the quality of babe/performer and age of the model is totally irrelevant, if Michelle Thorne and Ella Jolie's calls stats are better than Yasmine James then BS wouldn't sign Yasmine then again i blame people for having bad taste in women even if it is all about opinions, the channels are just there to make money
I swear, I dont'wanna be controversial and I don't want to create "dramas" on the internet...so i hope you don't misunderstand the meaning and tone of this post... that said, with all due respect, just because people don't share your taste doesn't mean they are "wrong", or they have "bad taste"...,for example, I see that you really like tori lee..well i don't like her at all . Neither of us is "wrong", or "right"....over the years, I have seen some people pretty much in love with one of these girls, and others who were completely uninterested in the same, exact girl ...this is the precise reason why the people who run these channels must consider (not only, but) principally the calls stats...because they are an objective indicator, unlike tastes concerning the performance or appearance of the girls.as you rightly say, the channels are just there to make money...it's business, after all
and look, i don't like this logic either! but if most people like Ella Jolie (i don't like her at all) more than jess west - a girl that I consider beautiful, and a great perfomer- and then if Ella guarantees higher earnings, what should they (s66 producers) do? i mean, if you were the s66 "manager", what would you do? I definitely know what I'd do. the more rational choice from an economic point of view...a golden rule for those who offer a product or a service is to try to understand and satisfy the tastes of the people,not to try to impose their own tastes..and, in this case, the call stats are the indicator of average taste of people who watch these shows
year after year after year, I keep reading that the shows were better "in the past"... maybe they were never that great (except in the pioneering era)?
|
|
01-11-2015 19:38 |
|
Joey 27
Posting Machine
Posts: 7,110
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 60
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
Manuel, from a business point of view i wouldn't get rid of Claire Richards, Kerrie Lee, Sophia Lares and Lola Knight even though they do nothing for me because i can tell they are good performers and they look like models, so i can see why they are popular im not blind or deluded when it comes to judging looks and performance, but im speaking as a viewer not a businessman
What do Victoria Roberts, Ella Jolie, Candy Charms, Paige Turnah, Michelle Thorne have to offer? if they were good performers i wouldn't complain as much but they aren't, i just don't get why they are so popular outside of this forum and that frustrates me because they are stopping a better standard of model and performer from getting a chance on S66
Cara Brett is on tonight you might not like her but she is quite popular on here, just a shame she is only on for an hour or so then we have to make do with Paige Turnah for the rest of the night, but she brings in the calls and the money for S66 somehow, i'd rather see some new girls of the caliber of Cara Brett though and i hope others agree with me on that
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2015 23:13 by Joey 27.)
|
|
01-11-2015 22:54 |
|