Censorship :-(
Sadly, no more caps. :-(
Posts: 5,362
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 52
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
|
|
01-11-2015 23:17 |
|
Manuel
I'd marry H. Lola in a heartbeat
Posts: 547
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 14
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
(01-11-2015 22:54 )Joey 27 Wrote: Manuel, from a business point of view i wouldn't get rid of Claire Richards, Kerrie Lee, Sophia Lares and Lola Knight even though they do nothing for me because i can tell they are good performers and they look like models, so i can see why they are popular im not blind or deluded when it comes to judging looks and performance, but im speaking as a viewer not a businessman
What do Victoria Roberts, Ella Jolie, Candy Charms, Paige Turnah, Michelle Thorne have to offer? if they were good performers i wouldn't complain as much but they aren't, i just don't get why they are so popular outside of this forum and that frustrates me because they are stopping a better standard of model and performer from getting a chance on S66
Cara Brett is on tonight you might not like her but she is quite popular on here, just a shame she is only on for an hour or so then we have to make do with Paige Turnah for the rest of the night, but she brings in the calls and the money for S66 somehow, i'd rather see some new girls of the caliber of Cara Brett though and i hope others agree with me on that
yeah, i see your point. of course i'd like to see new faces too!
and I feel very often frustrated to see great performers forced to divide the set...for example, I think it was crazy to not give any good chance to Jess West ..and i like to see more often kerrie lee on her own too..
But, among the girls that you have mentioned , I like Victoria, i think she's still a good, very sensual performer, in the past imo was a great performer. but, again, o f course it's a matter of personal taste! also, i think that Cara brett is a pretty dull performer.....u see, it doesn't make much sense to try giving a general judgment on these matters according to our personal tastes... I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who like the "hardcore" look of michelle thorne, or the domination-shows of ella
to each their own
year after year after year, I keep reading that the shows were better "in the past"... maybe they were never that great (except in the pioneering era)?
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2015 00:09 by Manuel.)
|
|
02-11-2015 00:06 |
|
Rammyrascal
Team Thicc
Posts: 102,626
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 251
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
(01-11-2015 22:54 )Joey 27 Wrote: Manuel, from a business point of view i wouldn't get rid of Claire Richards, Kerrie Lee, Sophia Lares and Lola Knight even though they do nothing for me because i can tell they are good performers and they look like models, so i can see why they are popular im not blind or deluded when it comes to judging looks and performance, but im speaking as a viewer not a businessman
What do Victoria Roberts, Ella Jolie, Candy Charms, Paige Turnah, Michelle Thorne have to offer? if they were good performers i wouldn't complain as much but they aren't, i just don't get why they are so popular outside of this forum and that frustrates me because they are stopping a better standard of model and performer from getting a chance on S66
Cara Brett is on tonight you might not like her but she is quite popular on here, just a shame she is only on for an hour or so then we have to make do with Paige Turnah for the rest of the night, but she brings in the calls and the money for S66 somehow, i'd rather see some new girls of the caliber of Cara Brett though and i hope others agree with me on that
joey just because you think Victoria, Ella Jolie, Candy Charms, Paige & Michelle Thorne are not good performers does not mean it is FACT that they are not good performers full stop. they clearly are good performers as far as the people that matter most to s66, the callers who bring in the money for s66.
as for what they have to offer, especially regarding Paige & Michelle, they are two of the UK's best known adult starts who will have lots of fans who will call them to interact with them which they cant do when watching Michelle and Paige's films. Candy appeals to those who like busty blondes & babes with tattoos, Ella Jolie appeals to those who like domination shows and small chested natural babes. Victoria appeals to those who like milfs, natural chested babes & those who like a woman with a nice rear
agree I would like to see new faces & hopefully s66 will bring some in if they think they can make them money
a member of the Piper Niven Cult
|
|
02-11-2015 00:21 |
|
R.W.Emerson
Banned
Posts: 349
Joined: Oct 2015
|
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion
Ella Jolie for me consistently does good shows and always has really nice outfit's be it in 'dom' mode or 'normal babe' mode. I've only called her once a couple of years ago in several years of viewing but I often give her a few mins watching time here and there and can see why she brings in the calls.
|
|
02-11-2015 04:53 |
|