Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion

(10-01-2016 20:09 )greenray Wrote:  Plenty of reasons. Most of the problems with Xpanded relate to sets, no microphones, no posting of pics etc etc.
I really like Jess,Louise, Priya, Lily and the babes I mentioned above. I've probably missed one or two out!

Absolutely. Their girls could, and should be, their saving grace... but...

When posters on here express so many objections to this channel you have to ask: Why would an operator make it sooo difficult to actually LIKE watching any babe, particularly ones like those named, on their channel? Babes that I, and seemingly many others, would be all over on any other babe channel... Even the best girls need SOME help to bring some of us onboard it would seem.

Actually, I find it quite hard to pinpoint exactly why it is that it's such an alienating, dispiriting, experience watching the cheap crapness that is Xpanded. The best I can say is that its something to do with the totally cold attitude to presentation.

If wanking with BS is an experience akin to eating at a Harvester restaurant (decent, reasonable, fairly efficient); Xpanded feels as welcoming as grabbing a twinky from a vending machine on a miserable wet railway station at midnight and calling it a meal! It serves a purpose but it sure ain't pleasant.

I actually get the feeling they are proud of making it difficult to enjoy watching their channels UNLESS you are calling*; with visual stimulus at the barest minimum it needs to be. The ultimate modern babe show tactic purveyor.

For the lover of the old-style babeshow it is a worrying template. Hopefully it's apparent commercial success will prove to be limited in scope.


* I think the reason they don't cultivate the 'fandom' of the babeshow, outside their own forum, is that they think that it represents, a minority, and generally the 'freeloading' aspects, of the customer base. I think, counter-intuitively, they figure the more casual fans are the true spenders.

This evening has got to be my ultimate late night lineup - the terrific trio of
Louise P, Nicole & Mia I never thought this dream would come true

(11-01-2016 00:19 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(10-01-2016 20:09 )greenray Wrote:  Plenty of reasons. Most of the problems with Xpanded relate to sets, no microphones, no posting of pics etc etc.
I really like Jess,Louise, Priya, Lily and the babes I mentioned above. I've probably missed one or two out!

Absolutely. Their girls could, and should be, their saving grace... but...

When posters on here express so many objections to this channel you have to ask: Why would an operator make it sooo difficult to actually LIKE watching any babe, particularly ones like those named, on their channel? Babes that I, and seemingly many others, would be all over on any other babe channel... Even the best girls need SOME help to bring some of us onboard it would seem.

Actually, I find it quite hard to pinpoint exactly why it is that it's such an alienating, dispiriting, experience watching the cheap crapness that is Xpanded. The best I can say is that its something to do with the totally cold attitude to presentation.

If wanking with BS is an experience akin to eating at a Harvester restaurant (decent, reasonable, fairly efficient); Xpanded feels as welcoming as grabbing a twinky from a vending machine on a miserable wet railway station at midnight and calling it a meal! It serves a purpose but it sure ain't pleasant.

I actually get the feeling they are proud of making it difficult to enjoy watching their channels UNLESS you are calling*; with visual stimulus at the barest minimum it needs to be. The ultimate modern babe show tactic purveyor.

For the lover of the old-style babeshow it is a worrying template. Hopefully it's apparent commercial success will prove to be limited in scope.


* I think the reason they don't cultivate the 'fandom' of the babeshow, outside their own forum, is that they think that it represents, a minority, and generally the 'freeloading' aspects, of the customer base. I think, counter-intuitively, they figure the more casual fans are the true spenders.

Not much needs adding to this post. Xpanded is the kind of channel that would have sprung up if the East German Stasi had created a babe channel. An austere channel providing the bare minimum. Horrible. If ever there was a channel which deserves to die, it's this one. Then the admittedly very good babe line up can rock up channels more appropriate for their standard.

I really dont understand the hatred towards this channel, it baffles me

very reasonable calls charges, the stream is excellent and the girls are amazing. not every babe is the same or will do the same and thats the same on all channels

i hope they continue for a long time and keep the lineup

They need to turn up the heating in the studio.

It used to be that the babes wore two items of clothing, a pair of nicks and another pair over the top.

It's now become an underwear fashion show...

the complaints are extremely petty

(14-01-2016 13:22 )richpk Wrote:  the complaints are extremely petty

No povs that I've ever seen; far too many two babes on one bed stints leaving the girls little room to manoeuvre; a static camera at almost all times, absolutely no leeway on content levels or extra pulse-racing outfits; nothing but beds, beds and more beds... These are not petty issues for a babe channel. They are the heart and soul of what facilitates good sessions to me.

Xpanded is the cosmetics of a babeshow without all feeling for them from those behind the camera.

The fact that it doesn't start till 3pm on freeview is a downer for me for a start. However, I do give it a chance now and again to try and get my pulse rising, but I am always disappointed after 10 mins. The girls always look rigid, hardly any movement at all. Not many rear views and total nakedness appears to be a punishable offence. How much different it is on the other channels. Never a night goes bye without some babe letting those panties tantalizingly slip to the side or ride up their crack.With some naughty girls you may even get a full on flash. This anticipation always keeps me glued to the screen. On the rare occasion it's been known for me to phone a girl who has persistently been rude to finish off the evening. Never a starter on this channel. The cheapness of the call isn't a factor for me, the girl has to have got me in the mood visually first, not going to happen here at present. Sorry.

(14-01-2016 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  

(14-01-2016 13:22 )richpk Wrote:  the complaints are extremely petty

No povs that I've ever seen; far too many two babes on one bed stints leaving the girls little room to manoeuvre; a static camera at almost all times, absolutely no leeway on content levels or extra pulse-racing outfits; nothing but beds, beds and more beds... These are not petty issues for a babe channel. They are the heart and soul of what facilitates good sessions to me.

Xpanded is the cosmetics of a babeshow without all feeling for them from those behind the camera.

from where i am sitting they are petty

i for one dont want what BS produce. the set could do with freshening up on Xpanded but nothing major

when i call the girls i like they still give me the service i enjoy the same as on any channel they have worked on

not every channel has to push the boundaries and go nude or do different sets you know

^ Getting within sniffing distance of the boundaries might help.

You are why the company succeeds like it does; it provides for your needs and good on you all for that. I don't see why you think it's baffling that others have different needs and expectations from their babe shows. It is that that just might keep the industry from turning into carbon copies of this slimmed-down version.