BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

(07-02-2016 09:31 )babefan2012 Wrote:  I like Lori she has a great body, but we all know she won't show pussy so i don't get why she does come this channel.

Because she knows she can get away with not showing anything.

When Ashley Appeared onscreen as the last live participant on the bsx extra channel, first thing that came to mind was yesssssssss here we go,she wont on the main channel so now we get see her fully naked on a channel in which she can, then..........hopes miserably dashed :-(

^was yesss really the first thing that came to mind ?..... you obviously didn't remember the time she was on before quite some while ago with Lori.
You would have loved that show.

Why is there no 'Ashley Emma BSX Caps' thread yet? Don't be embarrassed now.

I wonder how long this charade will last ? Bring back the G/G shows.

(07-02-2016 15:08 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Why is there no 'Ashley Emma BSX Caps' thread yet? Don't be embarrassed now.

I for one fell asleep before that stage in the proceedings - and I'm not embarrassed to say so.

Just to play devils advocate, this is actually a good thing if you're a regular caller to the other shows.

Think about it... you pay you're £5, then wait till your babe of choice is on BSX and you're virtually guaranteed to get straight through.
£5 is only 2 1/2 mins queueing time on the busy fta shows and any pussy action is just a bonus.

Of course there probably won't be enough callers thinking that way to make it work, but still..... snookered, where are you? Get in while you can

thing is mate. ashley showed its not for want of callers. she had quite a few initially where lori had 1.
it really is down to the fact lori has stopped showing as much as preeti, lucy, jenna. so guys just dont call her while shes on bsx..
no show = no calls.

i know its only £3-£5 for the night but to the punter he has already paid for pussy on bsx, so when he doesnt get it he feels scammed.
so is less inclined to call... bsx should remeber that guys have choices on what porn they want to pay for and they chose bsx. the least bsx could do is assure them they made the right choice and deliver on there own girls hype.

problem is even if lori did start showing she has pissed off so many regulars by not showing in the past*, that it would take her weeks to get her call/ppv stats back up to the point she would be making money, so she just doesnt bother.
i mention lori, but maddie is also having the same issue. i had her naked and fingering on the naughty cam. now you would be hard pressed to see her landing strip. as a result her calls have dried up on bsx as well.

*lori stopped showing a short time after her first perve cams went onto the tube sites. ever since has refused to do anything near as explicit.
so in a way its our fault as much as hers that she doesnt show. but then again if she hadnt pissed off the guys on her pervecam by constantly reducing the image quality to the point it was pointless.
they likely wouldnt have felt hard done by and likely wouldnt have upped her previous shows. (i'm assuming they did it out of some sort of revenge?)

(08-02-2016 15:32 )HEX!T Wrote:  thing is mate. ashley showed its not for want of callers. she had quite a few initially where lori had 1.
it really is down to the fact lori has stopped showing as much as preeti, lucy, jenna. so guys just dont call her while shes on bsx..
no show = no calls.

i know its only £3-£5 for the night but to the punter he has already paid for pussy on bsx, so when he doesnt get it he feels scammed.
so is less inclined to call... bsx should remeber that guys have choices on what porn they want to pay for and they chose bsx. the least bsx could do is assure them they made the right choice and deliver on there own girls hype.

problem is even if lori did start showing she has pissed off so many regulars by not showing in the past*, that it would take her weeks to get her call/ppv stats back up to the point she would be making money, so she just doesnt bother.
i mention lori, but maddie is also having the same issue. i had her naked and fingering on the naughty cam. now you would be hard pressed to see her landing strip. as a result her calls have dried up on bsx as well.

*lori stopped showing a short time after her first perve cams went onto the tube sites. ever since has refused to do anything near as explicit.
so in a way its our fault as much as hers that she doesnt show. but then again if she hadnt pissed off the guys on her pervecam by constantly reducing the image quality to the point it was pointless.
they likely wouldnt have felt hard done by and likely wouldnt have upped her previous shows. (i'm assuming they did it out of some sort of revenge?)

maybe Lori is embarressed by her big beef curtains? I luv em meaty...the meaty the better, but maybe she thinks they aint pretty? I knew a stripper who tucked her lovely lips up inside when on stage??

(08-02-2016 15:32 )HEX!T Wrote:  thing is mate. ashley showed its not for want of callers. she had quite a few initially where lori had 1.
it really is down to the fact lori has stopped showing as much as preeti, lucy, jenna. so guys just dont call her while shes on bsx..
no show = no calls.

i know its only £3-£5 for the night but to the punter he has already paid for pussy on bsx, so when he doesnt get it he feels scammed.
so is less inclined to call... bsx should remeber that guys have choices on what porn they want to pay for and they chose bsx. the least bsx could do is assure them they made the right choice and deliver on there own girls hype.

problem is even if lori did start showing she has pissed off so many regulars by not showing in the past*, that it would take her weeks to get her call/ppv stats back up to the point she would be making money, so she just doesnt bother.
i mention lori, but maddie is also having the same issue. i had her naked and fingering on the naughty cam. now you would be hard pressed to see her landing strip. as a result her calls have dried up on bsx as well.

*lori stopped showing a short time after her first perve cams went onto the tube sites. ever since has refused to do anything near as explicit.
so in a way its our fault as much as hers that she doesnt show. but then again if she hadnt pissed off the guys on her pervecam by constantly reducing the image quality to the point it was pointless.
they likely wouldnt have felt hard done by and likely wouldnt have upped her previous shows. (i'm assuming they did it out of some sort of revenge?)

It's strange that the producers keep putting Lori on BSX if she's the unmitigated failure that you keep claiming?



From what I gather, the latest tamedown has resulted in 'not even' hand-panty; some have speculated that it's because the likes of Ashley can go on, lie down, barely move, exactly as she does on FTA, but generate more income doing so? There have been comments that, e.g Amelia did the same thing, and she's been on unleashed, but I guess it's still Lori's fault, as anything wrong with BSX ALWAYS is, it seems!

I'm surprised she hasn't been blamed for the mess in the Middle East, or World hunger, though I'm sure it's just a matter of time