BabestationX & Live Shows - Chat & Discussion

(12-02-2016 11:03 )Mr Injecy Wrote:  

(11-02-2016 11:38 )Doc Holliday Wrote:  it means keeping the whole content very soft, to make sure the girls have no excuse for not appearing.

Yes I think so too. They have made the live shows softer, keeping everyone to a certain level, as that way girls have no reason to refuse to appear on the channel. It's an interesting roll of the dice and if the gamble goes wrong they could be facing a sharp loss of revenue.

indeed a sharp loss in revenue...if one viewer leaves thats a 50% loss to their income

(12-02-2016 11:03 )Mr Injecy Wrote:  

(11-02-2016 11:38 )Doc Holliday Wrote:  it means keeping the whole content very soft, to make sure the girls have no excuse for not appearing.

Yes I think so too. They have made the live shows softer, keeping everyone to a certain level, as that way girls have no reason to refuse to appear on the channel. It's an interesting roll of the dice and if the gamble goes wrong they could be facing a sharp loss of revenue.

Good points. I've argued in the past for a "softer" kind of show if it means that:
a) more girls (including maybe one or two I actually like) are prepared to do the shows and
b) the girls don't see it as an excuse to take the piss (like Lori).
As it is we seem to be getting the same small set of girls doing the shows and (to make matters worse) some seem to be seeing this as an opportunity to tame down what they do and show. Result - nobody's getting what they want, either hard or soft stuff.
Maybe BSX could have a weekly "guest challenge" for non-regular girls to appear, perhaps doing some "proper" 2-4-1s? After, we're only really talking about doing stuff that many girls used to do freely on the main shows a few years ago FFS! Yes, there'd probably be the odd disaster, but at least we'd get to see a few more girls on the channel.

(12-02-2016 11:47 )SteveHG Wrote:  As it is we seem to be getting the same small set of girls doing the shows

No, that isn't true. Last week we had Delia Rose and Kerrie Lee who were both newcomers to BSX.

All that's happening in practice though is that at the weekend it's become a "pay to view" version ( OK only £3 so far) of the other 3 regular FTA BS channels, but without any difference in the level/strength of the live-show part of the content from those channels ?

Instead of the likes of Lori upping their game, the real stars of bsx have had to tone theirs down. I think this is what in politics is known as a race to the bottom.

(12-02-2016 18:56 )Tractor boy Wrote:  ..a race to the bottom.

They're taking a top-down approach now. No bottoms allowed.

(12-02-2016 19:17 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  

(12-02-2016 18:56 )Tractor boy Wrote:  ..a race to the bottom.

They're taking a top-down approach now. No bottoms allowed.

Especially not front bottoms

BSX Little Extra, in theory it could work but will the girls who are hesitant to appear show that Little Extra, and after last weeks Maddie/Lori/Kerrie Lee/Ashley fiasco.....i think not, why go on to perform a normal free to air show on a pay to view channel,sorta defeats the object of calling it Bsx Xtra.

(12-02-2016 16:40 )William H Bonney Wrote:  No, that isn't true. Last week we had Delia Rose and Kerrie Lee who were both newcomers to BSX.

And Ashley Emma.

So we have 'No Show' Lori & Kerrie Lee Live Tonight........So Far....Will Danni H make an appearance...who knows