blahhh
Apprentice Poster
Posts: 14
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation: 0
|
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(29-03-2016 01:17 )mrmann Wrote: (29-03-2016 00:25 )Liverred Wrote: If I was her boss I would put us all out of our misery including Clare and drop her from the Rota. It would give the other so called performers a jolt too. The problem is the bosses and staff seem too pally and too interested in laughing and joking on set to do their jobs properly as we saw when Sophia and Kandi were on the other night.
If you got to be chummy with Clare, and fondle her bare breasts, get a crotch grind, feel her bare arse and film her vagina, would you let her go?
I can understand while the producers let her do mostly boring sessions, because she gets the calls still, and the other stuff I mentioned above.
I believe this to be the reason on all channels with regards to some of the women.
i agree mrmann - she makes plenty for the site from calls & perve i bet & not close to being a marginal employee at risk of being redundant.
Liverred can put himself out of his own misery by changing the channel or webfeed when clare is on.. i choose not to - dont need more than whatever she is in the mood to do since she is better eye candy than 99% of the rest of babechannels (on the 1 or 2 days a week she is on). i've peeked @ perve & it's not worth paying to wait & hope for something to happen for me.. others do not agree.
regarding her prospects, i'll give more weight to those like snookered who enjoy talking to her since that is the main point of the site.. to get you to call & charge you for it.
|
|
05-04-2016 04:45 |
|
Liverred
Posting Machine
Posts: 3,716
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 44
|
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(05-04-2016 04:45 )blahhh Wrote: (29-03-2016 01:17 )mrmann Wrote: [quote='Liverred' pid='1861711' dateline='1459211117']
If I was her boss I would put us all out of our misery including Clare and drop her from the Rota. It would give the other so called performers a jolt too. The problem is the bosses and staff seem too pally and too interested in laughing and joking on set to do their jobs properly as we saw when Sophia and Kandi were on the other night.
If you got to be chummy with Clare, and fondle her bare breasts, get a crotch grind, feel her bare arse and film her vagina, would you let her go?
I can understand while the producers let her do mostly boring sessions, because she gets the calls still, and the other stuff I mentioned above.
I believe this to be the reason on all channels with regards to some of the women.
i agree mrmann - she makes plenty for the site from calls & perve i bet & not close to being a marginal employee at risk of being redundant.
Liverred can put himself out of his own misery by changing the channel or webfeed when clare is on.. i choose not to - dont need more than whatever she is in the mood to do since she is better eye candy than 99% of the rest of babechannels (on the 1 or 2 days a week she is on). i've peeked @ perve & it's not worth paying to wait & hope for something to happen for me.. others do not agree.
regarding her prospects, i'll give more weight to those like snookered who enjoy talking to her since that is the main point of the site.. to get you to call & charge you for it.
If you are happy to just watch static girls making no effort then knock yourself out. S66 probably suits you down to the ground. I on the other hand prefer girls and cameramen who make an effort which is why I now prefer Bs.
NEVER FORGET THE 96!
|
|
05-04-2016 22:58 |
|