The Official WWE Discussion Thread

shano123 · 25-05-2016 17:46

(25-05-2016 14:02 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Cody Rhodes wife Eden has also asked for her release & WWE have granted it

Ahh man not Eden, she's too sexy to be removed

shano123 · 25-05-2016 17:50

hate what they doing with aj styles, fans are backing him so why not just let him have the belt even if it's just for a month, with Seth coming back his just gonna get shoved back in mid card again . Come on wwe no one gives a shit about reigns!!! It's never gonna work and they have to accept that, it's been a disaster from the beginning, the guy sucks in everything!!!

bigguy01 · 25-05-2016 21:37

rollins did what reigns should have when the fans first started to boo him when he beat sheamus and triple h for the title by turning to the crowd and say screw you. why couldn't wwe have 2 heels feuding over the title? it would be refreshing than having faces v heels.

Bank$ · 26-05-2016 00:44

I believe WWE missed an opportunity to put rollins face in his return (for a month at least), the reaction he got both on extreme rules and raw would of made perfect sense to then put reigns over as a solid heel because theres just no going back at this point, the fact there was no real brawl or anything from the aftermath made it lackluster, really putting themselves in the corner because now depending on they city there doing shows at it could become heel v heel which just makes no sense.

Doddle · 26-05-2016 06:37

You might have thought they could at least have Rollins go through Styles first as a transition move, rather than just supplanting him altogether as though the Styles feud was just an unmentionable embarrassment that we should forget all about ASAP (clearly the Vince view).

(25-05-2016 21:37 )bigguy01 Wrote: rollins did what reigns should have when the fans first started to boo him when he beat sheamus and triple h for the title by turning to the crowd and say screw you. why couldn't wwe have 2 heels feuding over the title? it would be refreshing than having faces v heels.

It's called drama, mate, good versus evil Tongue

shano123 · 26-05-2016 06:38

(26-05-2016 00:44 )Legit Bank$ Wrote: I believe WWE missed an opportunity to put rollins face in his return (for a month at least), the reaction he got both on extreme rules and raw would of made perfect sense to then put reigns over as a solid heel because theres just no going back at this point, the fact there was no real brawl or anything from the aftermath made it lackluster, really putting themselves in the corner because now depending on they city there doing shows at it could become heel v heel which just makes no sense.

I didn't watch but I agree, Rollins should have been the face

shano123 · 26-05-2016 06:44

Just a lil more about wwe is they make you back so many wrestlers who are given main even spots like Owens, styles, Ambrose,stretching back you can even say wade barett when he was nexus. Then when all these guys lose and fall back into mid card that's when no gives a shit, that's why there's loads that are asking for releases cuz they are fed up. Cody should have been a star by now but he was stuck doing stupid gimmicks. They can't keep rotating amongst the tried and tested, they have to pull the trigger with these other guys and actually give the belt because it's pathetic how they are nothing once it's over. One return happens and that's the end for AJ, ridiculous.

HannahsPet · 26-05-2016 06:54

got a feeling that they are gonna make rollins head of the club thereby starting a feud with AJ with him costing rollins the title @ MITB anything to keep reigns as Champion

Bank$ · 26-05-2016 11:52

Heres the latest on the proposed draft coming next month.

Quote: NoDQ.com > WWE > Lots of news and notes regarding the WWE brand split
Posted by Aaron Rift on 05/26/2016 at 12:19 AM

Here are some news and notes regarding the brand extension according to Dave Meltzer of F4WOnline.com:

- One of the main reasons for WWE bring back the brand split is to help increase television ratings and the ratings of Smackdown in particular, hence Smackdown becoming a permanent live show on Tuesday nights. The idea is the change will also have more people watching Smackdown live instead of on DVR.

- It’s expected that Stephanie McMahon will run one show while Shane McMahon runs the other and both are expected to be babyface characters at first.

- The belief right now is that John Cena will be the main star on one show and Roman Reigns will be the main star on the other. It’s not a sure thing that Brock Lesnar will end up being on RAW.

- The RAW crew will be doing live events on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday while the Smackdown crew will just be running Saturday and Sunday nights. It’s possible that Smackdown live events will take place again on Monday nights like in the past.

- While the plan right now is for there to be two world championships, the tentative plan for the Women’s championship is for Charlotte to appear on both shows.

- Vince McMahon is said to be “really pumped” about the new brand split and its possibilities.

I think 2 world titles could work, however both the tag and womens should be able to go from one to another the last thing we need is more championships, this could be an interesting move if done correctly but wether they stick to their guns long enough for it to effective time will tell.

*rpj316* · 26-05-2016 12:04

Cena and Reigns as the star attraction on each show,may god help us all.

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode The Official WWE Discussion Thread
Author	Message