Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 95 Vote(s) - 3.97 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion

Author Message
euleri Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 275
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 11
Post: #3781
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Wasn't at all bad show IMO. Plenty of nakedness & POV shots + I loved that schoolgirl skirt. She seemed more tired than usual at the end, even went as far as climbing on to the bed and pulling the covers over herself. Didn't stop the overenthusiastic cameraman though, who sent the TV camera right after her. Smile
31-05-2016 13:42
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HEX!T Away
Retired
*****

Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
Post: #3782
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
hey il be the first to say she had a good stint from 10pm till about 12:30- 1am. but after that her calls dried up as she lay about on the bed chatting to her producer.
in fact she got so many calls that by 4am she called it quits and went home.
on the other channel ella was consistently getting calls while clare wasnt.
clare is a way better visual perfomer by a country mile. yet it was ella who was busy all night in comparison.

so no its not a case of cant please every 1. its a case of clare has to keep her numbers up consistently. not just have a good couple of nights a month.

Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.

Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
31-05-2016 13:45
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
euleri Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 275
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 11
Post: #3783
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(31-05-2016 13:45 )HEX!T Wrote:  hey il be the first to say she had a good stint from 10pm till about 12:30- 1am. but after that her calls dried up as she lay about on the bed chatting to her producer.
in fact she got so many calls that by 4am she called it quits and went home.
on the other channel ella was consistently getting calls while clare wasnt.
clare is a way better visual perfomer by a country mile. yet it was ella who was busy all night in comparison.

so no its not a case of cant please every 1. its a case of clare has to keep her numbers up consistently. not just have a good couple of nights a month.

Seems to me Clare started having problems with callers as soon as she switched channels with Ella. Before that it was miss Jolie who was wiggling her phone around more often than not.
31-05-2016 14:00
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Glenn Miller Online
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 440
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 24
Post: #3784
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(31-05-2016 13:42 )euleri Wrote:  Didn't stop the overenthusiastic cameraman though, who sent the TV camera right after her. Smile

Yes Clare's cameraman last night was super-enthusiastic.
31-05-2016 14:16
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rammyrascal Online
Team Thicc
*****

Posts: 102,585
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation: 250
Post: #3785
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Calls are always going to dry up in the 2nd half of the night from around 1am, especially on a weeknight as people start going to bed if they haven't already done so.

Of course Clare has to keep her stats up otherwise s66 would not have her on. Same applies for all babeshow babes on all the channels.

a member of the Piper Niven Cult
31-05-2016 14:17
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
William H Bonney Offline
More sinned against than sinning
*****

Posts: 2,824
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 53
Post: #3786
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(31-05-2016 14:00 )euleri Wrote:  Seems to me Clare started having problems with callers as soon as she switched channels with Ella. Before that it was miss Jolie who was wiggling her phone around more often than not.

Yes exactly. Clare was busy with callers until she was moved to the lesser channel.
31-05-2016 14:18
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jackster100 Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 922
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 12
Post: #3787
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
good night from Clare, lots of naked ness again love her in the bed but missed a trick by not being under the covers, hope this nakedness carries on and maybe another window show soon. hope she's on again before next Monday.
31-05-2016 15:09
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
unparalleled Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 329
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 13
Post: #3788
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Best thing to happen to these babe channels in ages.
31-05-2016 15:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Didokan Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 123
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 1
Post: #3789
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
come on guys can't u see ,Clare spent all show doing 2 to 3 poses with all kind of sets , the nakedness is good but it limits her moves , hope for a better mix next show ...
31-05-2016 21:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chelsealion Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 118
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 5
Post: #3790
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(29-05-2016 23:01 )Bazza19976 Wrote:  Just a question re perve cam, how does it work do you pay by the minute to view & is Claire worth the money on cam?.

You can sometimes tell just from watching Clare on the TV show that the perve cam viewers are getting a right eyeful.
31-05-2016 21:52
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply