Europe, Referendum & Brexit (formerly Europe..IN or OUT??)

was sun peice last night about he was like Why should I take on all this hard shit i think it was that save dave campaign the leavers started thursday evening that said they would be behind him whatever the result first signature was boris's

(25-06-2016 22:43 )wackawoo Wrote:  

(25-06-2016 22:11 )tony confederate Wrote:  It's hugely ironic that the people behind the Brexit are in no hurry to actually go ahead with it.

It's Cameroon, that refuses to impliment it.

Cameron has resigned so makes sense that the new Conservative leader does it. That way if it's Boris he can clear up his own shit

I can't claim ownership of this 'find', it was shown to me, but it seems it could be possible that the Scottish Parliament could veto the whole thing!

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa...otnote-000

(25-06-2016 21:43 )munch1917 Wrote:  Just one semester? I've done more than that, as well as a heap of mathematics, so I also know a bit about manipulation of stats as well as graphs in general, and the graph is fine in my opinion, it serves its purpose and represents the data clearly enough for most muggles to understand, but whatever 'dude'

TUT TUT

In what way is 20 bil the same has 10 bil?, if both on the y axis were 20 bil, the amount recieved would look a lot smaller, you as a mathematician should know this more than anyone; most 'muggles', would look at that, see the histogram and think, oh, we get nearly as much back as we give.

There's not even any good reason to go to 20 bil any way the highest of the net contribution looks to be under 15 bil, that is done purely to make the blue look smaller, put the 15 and 20 bil on the negative, or put the bars side by side, and that would look ALOT less (especially in 2015), and you know it.

This is another example of people not reading what i put, I said nothing about the words, but the graph, especially the histogram.

(25-06-2016 22:28 )george lusk Wrote:  Yes the Brexit leaders are now scared.

The only course of action to implement Brexit is to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty.

The longer they put it off because they seem to have lost their nerve the more they lose credibility.

And the longer they put it off the more chance there is that they will never do it.

This is why I said earlier that Brexit will never happen.

The whole point of a referendum is that you get the result you want, you have a mandate and you implement article 50 the next day.

Which is exactly what we were told would happen in the event of a Leave vote.

Now Cameron is refusing to do it and the mug Brexit leaders are clueless and don't know what to do about it.

If they wait several months the opinion polls might show support for Remain now in a big majority and the pressure will be there to hold a second referendum. If a second referendum isn't held a 'no confidence' motion in parliament will trigger a general election and possible death to Brexit.

As I said, the whole point of a referendum is that it gives you a mandate - and you act on it immediately whilst you still have that mandate.

The longer you delay the more questionable your mandate becomes.

You see already how people are demanding a second referendum - all because the mug Brexit leaders have basically been outsmarted by Cameron.

(25-06-2016 22:49 )SecretAgent Wrote:  Cameron has resigned so makes sense that the new Conservative leader does it. That way if it's Boris he can clear up his own shit

Yes he's resigned but he's sort off care taker PM till then, I assume, if the world will end and the UK will sink into the sea and everybody who's in it will die of malnutrition as the remains will have it, he doersn't want blood on his hands.

David Cameron is never going to invoke article 50 because he was on the opposing side.
The word of the British Public in the European referendum will not go unheard, do not believe otherwise.

(25-06-2016 22:57 )mysterion Wrote:  The whole point of a referendum is that you get the result you want, you have a mandate and you implement article 50 the next day.

Which is exactly what we were told would happen in the event of a Leave vote.

Yes we were told that a Leave vote on Thursday would lead to article 50 being invoked on Friday.

Which is exactly what should have happened!

Even as a Leave voter myself, I've got to say that the Brexit leaders are clowns to let Cameron make fools of them in this way.

Odds from Paddy Power.

A second EU referendum to be held: 3/1

This is Cameron getting his own back on the electorate for defying the establishment and refusing to be bullied or blackmailed into voting the way he wanted. He knew that by resigning it would leave the country in limbo with no one to formally invoke article 50 until a new leader had been elected.

Piece of shit...