Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion

Did xpanded get a warning or something? just seems strange why there is so much nudity on it now when there used to be just rare nudity i still think the demise of storm has something to do with it. Maybe after Storm went they needed another channel to provide more nudity i am only guessing here.

(29-11-2016 21:27 )rama lama ding dong Wrote:  have they bought shares in a tattooists?

Why? Because they've got quite a few tattooed babes on their roster and you don't like tattooed babes? Just wondering

(08-12-2016 13:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(29-11-2016 21:27 )rama lama ding dong Wrote:  have they bought shares in a tattooists?

Why? Because they've got quite a few tattooed babes on their roster and you don't like tattooed babes? Just wondering

now that post has been up for over a week and yet you suddenly decide to criticise it.

I'm not criticising, just seen the post and wondering why you would make such a random comment like that

(08-12-2016 11:33 )Kingsmind Wrote:  Did xpanded get a warning or something? just seems strange why there is so much nudity on it now when there used to be just rare nudity i still think the demise of storm has something to do with it. Maybe after Storm went they needed another channel to provide more nudity i am only guessing here.

I Think u might be right as there's on storm anymore it means Xpanded babes are being allowed to go naked which I have to say I applaud, love seeing Rosie rendall and Lara naked just such a shame Tori left at the time they seemed to be allowed to go naked more

I think the term sardines in a tin applies to the Xpanded channels tonight. There are 6 babes across the 2 channels.

it's 3 now, the day babes Tara & Nevaeh have both left now so it's just the 3 nightbabes, Michelle, Roxi and Tiffany

I just cannot get on with this channel. It ought to be good but it just isn't. They got high res feeds, and good lighting, but they actually over-illuminate and lose detail in glare. Then the roster is not to my taste, and the camerawork is woeful. Girls over-made-up and try too hard with the negligee. A girl-next-door type or 3 would not go amiss. Movement and innovation is non-existent.

Xpanded is 65p a minute compared to £2 for the other channels. Personally, I think the girls they have are better than babestations. They do double up a lot, but what do you expect for less than a third of the price of the others. I think most of the people who complain about this channel are people who don't call, and just watch, though if it wasn't for xpanded/playboy I doubt if I would phone either.

(16-12-2016 11:20 )nikk18 Wrote:  Xpanded is 65p a minute compared to £2 for the other channels. Personally, I think the girls they have are better than babestations. They do double up a lot, but what do you expect for less than a third of the price of the others. I think most of the people who complain about this channel are people who don't call, and just watch, though if it wasn't for xpanded/playboy I doubt if I would phone either.

Very good point about the pricing but then they have high production values with the strong feed resolution and no skimping on the lighting, so it is not a cheap and cheerful product in that sense. I think they bank on higher volume of calls with cheaper rates.

They only have 2 cheap sets and less staff and rental to pay, so that saves cost. They have a good sustainable model, but a few tweaks and it would be superb IMHO.

I cam and call other channels but never this one, and that tells me a lot.