Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

It's certainly not a new innovation. Studio 66 have been giving online viewers some bonuses for a while now. That includes Lucy Anne, who's been terrific recently, although some of her previous extras have been labelled as 'slips' when they obviously weren't.

People still watch this operation?

(15-05-2017 00:39 )bigglesworth Wrote:  It's good to have a consensus, although whether Studio 66 sold the EPG slot or just the right to use the EPG slot really makes no practical difference.

That is a very fair point.

(17-05-2017 14:04 )admiral decker Wrote:  Studio 66 have been giving online viewers some bonuses for a while now.

I expect the grand scheme is to lure people away from their TVs by giving them an incentive to watch online.

^ They might want to fix that heap of a webstream first then.

(16-05-2017 22:03 )Rake Wrote:  Lucy Anne Just did a superb tease hour - if you watched the website-only, non-tv, non-Pervert Camera feed.

I agree that Lucy Anne was superb, although on this occasion I hadn't realised it wasn't on TV.

(17-05-2017 02:59 )kevin symons Wrote:  I watched Lucy Anne's tease hour on the web and I agree it was very good, but I don't think it was a lot different to the last one I saw.

^ Agreed. Joking aside, I always thought that there were worst exponents of the tease hour than LA - although her teases are pretty stagnate now visually. Maybe this was the reason for the different approach last night? As Rake says though the quality of the experience depended on which platform you we watching on.

(16-05-2017 22:03 )Rake Wrote:  ...
A new innovation?

New innovation? No, 66 (and other operators - bangbabes for one) tried second camera web-only streams a several years back. But it's obviously something that 66 have been experimenting with again over the past couple of months.

I do think it's quite wrong to conflate these type examples with the 'slips', by LA and others, that were posted on the forum earlier this year though. Although not slips in the truest sense (the babe meant to show what she did) I think it's quite clear that then, in LA's case at least, the babe didn't mean to show what she did to the main camera. Back then nips were broadcast to the regular stream by accident. In more recent cases (I'm speaking of the two Cara pussy shows and at least one Hannah web-only arse fest in addition to last night's upskirting), what we saw was clearly streamed there entirely by design.

How about Tori and Caty nude in the shower, with the alternate cam

Good show tonight. Plenty of pussy from Tori and even some from Caty!

(17-05-2017 14:40 )Scots Napoleon Wrote:  I expect the grand scheme is to lure people away from their TVs by giving them an incentive to watch online.

Quite, but I think what they might be about bears looking at in a little more detail than that as it seems likely to me that it could point to future developments on the shows.

Yes, I feel it can only be that these latest web-only elements are a patent attempt to raise awareness about 66's websites and its viewing 'possibilities'. The aim is indeed surely to get more guys away from their comfy living room zone and on to a smart device (if they have an old fashioned set up) or better yet to prompt them to invest in the tech that can put the streams right there on their main TVs. To some extent the operators are still trying to break down the old comfort barriers of a previously more passive interaction which required just a phone by the callers' side. They now want more tech use, more often.

(I think we need to avoid falling into the trap of assuming that everyone who 'uses' the shows are as savvy and 'up on things' as many forumites. 66 seem to feel that there is still some educating and luring of sections of its customer base to be done here.)

Why are they doing this now? Well I think the initial bloom of the camming is over. But you build on success. It now must be worked at, encouraged, like anything else.

Also, we shouldn't forget that the operators' sites have the upcoming age verifications regs to overcome. This will put up customer resistance to using their sites some as it will be an off-putting barrier to interaction. The operators need to give guys reasons to overcome that. Web-only content on the regular streams is one incentive that way...

The obvious concern is that presenting stronger visuals on the regular streams like this might discourage pervcam use and result in 66 stopping these welcome 'extras' before they get started... But sometimes I think we have to give more credit to the operators than we do. They know their figures and must have some indications that things like this will work in their favour. The availability of such material could well drive more people to want to see those sort of levels more often (while paying for the privilege of course) especially when they have been brought right to its doorstep.

BS's recent upping of their stream quality is another effort to encourage web use presumably; as are their new "curtain" shows - although, as always with BS, so crude are their methods that they provoke a fair amount of negativity from their potential customers with such things. So there would appear to be little turf war going on here for who can get the uphand with the next level of web use.

We may even be headed for a two-teir payment scheme from the shows if the use of additionally angled streams continues. Now that the pervcams' security has been beefed up, the operators may be planning to encrypt the regular streams at certain times too. During these times they could be made available to just paid up website members. This monetisation of visuals is what we have seen so much of lately. It would only be par for the course.

A more specific target for the operators is presumably the vastly increasing ownership of 'kodi' boxes and alike. (Their use really took off at the end of last year.) Exclusive stream content could bring new IP viewing customers to the channels for the very first time. (Any stigma around tame 900-use is minimalised on such boxes given that they can stream HC porn as easily as anything else online.)

Of course, a little good vibe around a 'new' innovation or two is never bad for a product. And there's nothing better than a freebie give-away or two (however short-lived) for creating just such feel good factor and word-of-mouth.

Hopefully, the tickering with such things that we have seen from the operators lately will all work out well in the long run. More options for the customer should give greater satisfaction eventually and lead to a more vibrant revived industry - which equals more scope for further innovations in the future and more chance of attracting top quality babes once again... In theory at least.

That's the trouble with capitalism I suppose, it can actually work in bringing the paying customer what they want! ... It's a bugger I know.