Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Straw man or no... The last time the word consensus was used on this thread it was a grand total of FOUR people IIRC that had agreed with the proposition! ... So when a certain crowd use it the rules are different it seems. (Sarcasm.) Many more guys have posted along the lines I was indicating.

I find it remarkable how pompous and self important some posters can come across on the back of paying £1.50pm (past) or £2pm (present ) for the privelege of speaking to some good looking bint on a wank channel!

And now we are supposed to believe that information revealed in this way needs to be treated akin to national secrets! :/ Perhaps this is why misinformation can creep into these conversations?

A consistency of logic needs to be considered here too. Decker and crew have been particularly persistent over the years in stating the lower epg numbered channels Sky channels are considered prestigious amongst any operator's line up. I see no reason to doubt this. It has a logic. But at 66 these are the channels that predominately feature solo babes are they not? Now we are told no one can think of a reason why a babe would request such a slot! Make up your minds gents. Are they important to everyone or not?

...All this all has bugger all to do with my particular taste in babes too btw. I'm quite capable of looking at these things from an objective viewpoint thanks.

(11-06-2017 18:50 )Joey 27 Wrote:  I have to question why Clare and Hannah always get their own set as they aren't on Freeview that much so don't appear to have great call stats. infact Tori has got the FV slot over them in the past but she often has to share a set, plus Stella Cox is a pornstar and seems to be very busy on the phone but she is often stuck in DBS

Those two get solo slots as they are very popular on pervecam and need to be solo to put on the shows there fans want, some girls make as much or more money from cam than the phone on the channels now,

^That could be why Tori went off screen at 1am the other night to do pervcam instead of being on screen sharing a set.
The question is who will be next to get "solo set status" is there enough room left for anyone else now

(10-06-2017 13:05 )Dave_A Wrote:  Concerning other channels, did the past and present S66 girls give you this information about other channels, or have you also been speaking to girls from other channels about this and they have given you the same assurance ?

Past S66 girls and girls from other channels are not different things, they are the same thing. In this case anyway.

(10-06-2017 13:05 )Dave_A Wrote:  Also if you don't mind me asking, did you actually ring the S66 girls, and girls from other channels, and were given this info via ringing adult chat lines ?, or was this information and assurance given to you by other methods ? .

Camming is a better way. It is possible to get this info when calling girls, but it's not possible to talk for long on such subjects as adult calls need to be of an adult nature, in order to keep the listeners listening. I realise that people call Evelyn and have lengthy discussions with her about why she's using a particular set, but that's during daytime hours, which is quite different. At night the girls are usually conscious of the need to look after their listeners, so most of them prefer to keep non-adult chat within reason. Camming is therefore the preferred method, although if you have called/cammed with a girl for some time she may well provide you with other ways of contacting her.

(10-06-2017 18:51 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Im not sure it really is as simple as the girls with the best call stats get their own set, Ella is always on but she has to share a set sometimes

You're right, it isn't that simple. It depends what day they are on.

(11-06-2017 16:19 )Joey 27 Wrote:  Two classic examples of preferential treatment are Jennifer Jade and Jasmine James, Jennifer is always on Friday night and Jasmine James is always on Sunday night

Another classic example of preferential treatment is that Tori Lee is also allowed to pick and choose when she works. To be honest with you, if you're going to make anymore posts on this subject then Tori Lee needs to be high on your complaint list.

You see this preferential treatment you refer to isn't really preferential at all, as I get the impression that all the girls at S66 seem to more or less work the days they want to work, though there are some girls like Ella who are happy to work anytime.

(11-06-2017 16:19 )Joey 27 Wrote:  S66 tend to do things very differently compared to BS and Xpanded and it annoys the fuck out of me, but if i was a Clare, Lola and Hannah fan then i wouldn't have much to complain about as they always get their own set, just like i pointed out last week

Yes you're right, S66 do things differently, because as stated above they are more flexible with shifts than the other channels and try to give girls the shifts they want.

You're not right about Lola, as she has often shared a set and not just in the past either, she shared as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

(12-06-2017 03:33 )southlondonphil Wrote:  

(11-06-2017 16:19 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

Another classic example of preferential treatment is that Tori Lee is also allowed to pick and choose when she works. To be honest with you, if you're going to make anymore posts on this subject then Tori Lee needs to be high on your complaint list.

You see this preferential treatment you refer to isn't really preferential at all, as I get the impression that all the girls at S66 seem to more or less work the days they want to work, though there are some girls like Ella who are happy to work anytime.


Yes you're right, S66 do things differently, because as stated above they are more flexible with shifts than the other channels and try to give girls the shifts they want.

You're not right about Lola, as she has often shared a set and not just in the past either, she shared as recently as a couple of weeks ago.

You know that for a fact do you? did Tori tell you that herself? its very kind of her she doesn't demand to always be on solo if she is allowed to pick and choose her shifts, its quite convenient she chooses to work when she has to share a set with girls who are low down the pecking order isn't it

Its only on very rare occasions Lola has to share a set, but if Tori is allowed to pick and choose her shifts like you say she does, maybe she will come in on Tuesday night and share with Lola, i can't see them sharing a set anytime soon though

Jennifer seems to be the worst culprit for choosing when to work as she only does Friday nights, what if 2 other girls want to do Friday night but one of them can't because Jen gets that slot?

Who knows maybe they all get to pick and choose their shifts, but i would guess its only the few near the top of the pecking order who can

^ I've always said that 66 is largely bossed by the babes. That is why those 'names' that have been there a while, stay there. It is run so as to be as flexible as possible for the girls. 66 seem to try to make that their USP with them. And, for certain personality types, it probably trumps a little extra cash that they could command if they were interested in a move elsewhere.

They strive to be a family and help each other out in an effort to keep everyone sweet.

The flipside of this coin is unforunately that sometimes 66 can end up feeling to the babeshows like Last of the Summer Wine did to the British sit-com to the forumite - a retirement home for old hands and for lack of ambition. It is that that is reflected onscreen and causes a lot of critism here. From 'preferential' treatment, to eating onscreen. (The little indications are more prevalent on daytime; we see dogs in work, extensive make-up applications onscreen and vaping just offscreen, just off the top of my head.) The successful babes are made to feel valued by being given ultimate leeway. But the drive and competition can then be seen as not so forfronted as at somewhere like BS.

Nights in particular has a feeling of safe habour found for many. They get the shifts they want and Ella will fill in if the boyfriend drops a night out on them at the last minute. Full commitment to the wanking cause is seen as a little old-hat and unneccessary I feel.

Whether any of this actually procludes a pecking order to scheduling in the event of clashes is probably a matter of perspective. If the roster is delberately maintained at a level just to keep everyone by and large 'as is'... is that just the natural order of things?

So, it looks like Gru and all his minions don't really have all the answers either.

Just as I thought

At the risk of setting Joey off again I'll just throw this in...

Is it possible the babes who agree to share a set get paid a higher rate?

Think about it. If, as is widely believed, call rates for the babe suffer if she's sharing a set why not offer her a bit more to compensate if the company makes more money in total from 2 babes even if their individual call rates are lower.

It might just be that simple.