Babeshows - General Chat & Discussion

Could this be the next interactivity step in the survival of these channels: https://www.engadget.com/2017/06/28/porn...-sex-toys/

UPDATE: Looks the original source doesn't link linking. Changed it to different site's version of same news story from the summer. (Pornhub moving into compatibility with Fleshlight and such.)

(15-10-2017 11:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Could this be the next interactivity step in the survival of these channels: https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/28/tubest...s-the-way/

link doesnt work for me

(15-10-2017 04:54 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^^ It would be relatively simple and cost effective you'd think to set up two subscription rates - one with cam/call minutes and one without.

The two rates would be the same surely. I don't remember them putting the price up when they started adding the free minutes, so without the free minutes why should the price go down?

(15-10-2017 11:21 )papahet3969 Wrote:  

(15-10-2017 11:05 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Could this be the next interactivity step in the survival of these channels: https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/28/tubest...s-the-way/

link doesnt work for me

Replace tubestation with a well known site beginning with P.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=tubestatio...0851EDA366

I guess I better start saving up for my Fernanda Ferrari look-a-like android sex doll LOL.

(15-10-2017 11:53 )barracuda Wrote:  

(15-10-2017 04:54 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^^ It would be relatively simple and cost effective you'd think to set up two subscription rates - one with cam/call minutes and one without.

The two rates would be the same surely. I don't remember them putting the price up when they started adding the free minutes, so without the free minutes why should the price go down?

Just because something is added for free doesn't mean it has zero value (they made the value of the package better) and that a now 'lesser' option couldn't possibly be done at a reduced price.

Are you certain that their margins are at a minimum on the site rates? Rates per content alters over time in any case; such a thing could easily be factored in at a change. There was talk of pics and vids being cut back when the change you speak of was introduced IIRC.

Not all guys are after the same stuff is the point. The channels need to be continue to be more diversity minded.

(15-10-2017 15:03 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Just because something is added for free doesn't mean it has zero value (they made the value of the package better) and that a now 'lesser' option couldn't possibly be done at a reduced price.

It would be self defeating. The object of doling out free minutes is to encourage people to use the cams. If they were allowed to join without getting the free minutes it would defeat the object of the exercise.

No it wouldn't. What I'm advocating, a second option, could be a couple of quid cheaper and would actually highlight the saving of the first even more. A win-win.

[attachment=85337]

I think they are listening. More camera angles like this and I might end up a macy leigh fan.

[attachment=85338]

Ditto