I noticed from the latest Ofcom report that Life Class, that Channel 4 lunchtime programme wih the full frontal nudity, was found to be not in breach following 37 complaints.
Yet again, this this highlights the unbelievable contradictions demonstrated by Ofcom.
It appears that Life Class broke no rules because it is classed as "educational" and the nudity is seen as being "non sexual". Yet, Ofcom have often stated the importance of protecting children with their stance on the babe channels.
That being the case, can someone tell me how a programme showing full frontal male and female nudity can be regarded as ok when it's shown at lunchtime on a mainstream channel and at a time when kids looking for the latest episode of Teletubbies can easily stumble across it? Does the fact that the nudity is "non sexual" really come into play if a kid of 7 or 8 stumbles across it? Surely the biggest factor is that there is nudity at all? And if it's deemed ok at just after midday on a mainstream channel then surely by default it also has to be ok on a specialist adult channel after 10.00 at night?
This would seem to open up interesting avenues for the babe channels though. If, say a clothed Alexa was to draw a fully nude Dionne on Elite Nights, would that then be classed as ok by Ofcom on account of the fact that it's "educational"?
Maybe they should try it and find out