Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

wouldn't that be the same as being on paid memberships?

looking at their Girls page I noticed during the summer they had former XP presenter Esme on their shows for a while anyone know what has happened to her?

Anyone else noticed that the Sky TV channels for S66 have exceptionally low resolution and hence poor picture quality tonight?

Yeah I noticed that too but with such a poor choice of girls on tonight I'm really not that bothered

I think 66 has been quite good lately, not great but a lot more consistent than on bs, and with the girls not slaving to pervecam it is actually very watchable most nights,
They make the best of what they have and still try to put on good TV shows, Lola in the bath a perfect example, if that was on bs it would have been behind the iron curtain on pervecam being watched by about 2 people if they where lucky,
66 should be lorded on her for doing what u see being asked for in the bs thread putting on a proper old school babeshow,
There problem is they have a small roster, so people flicking through the channel see Caty and are like same old boring Caty show and move on, but the girls are most nights putting content out far better than the other two channels,
If they signed 4-5 of the girls being under used by bs I think I would be given 66 a lot more of my time and money,

Whether S66 can be crowned babe channel of the year remains to be seen as I do think XP could give them a close run for their money

(29-10-2017 11:25 )winsaw Wrote:  I think 66 has been quite good lately, not great but a lot more consistent than on bs, and with the girls not slaving to pervecam it is actually very watchable most nights,
They make the best of what they have and still try to put on good TV shows, Lola in the bath a perfect example, if that was on bs it would have been behind the iron curtain on pervecam being watched by about 2 people if they where lucky,
66 should be lorded on her for doing what u see being asked for in the bs thread putting on a proper old school babeshow,
There problem is they have a small roster, so people flicking through the channel see Caty and are like same old boring Caty show and move on, but the girls are most nights putting content out far better than the other two channels,
If they signed 4-5 of the girls being under used by bs I think I would be given 66 a lot more of my time and money,

I agree with you.
S66 has much higher production values than BS, including better lighting and picture quality. Also, S66 girls seem to have more freedom to try stuff out. However as Winshaw points out they need more girls to avoid the over exposure of familiar faces. (Like BS !!!)
I would like to see athletic stunner Atlanta Moreno on this channel. She is underused and over regulated on BS and would positively shine at S66.
I also think is very sad to witness the decline of great performers like Dannii Harwood and Lucy Summers since they joined BS.

Just think the golden oldies channel 940 is a waste, could get more day girls to do the tease shows after 10pm, Kira kadey was the best seen for a long long time.

(29-10-2017 13:59 )TheProf Wrote:  

(29-10-2017 11:25 )winsaw Wrote:  I think 66 has been quite good lately, not great but a lot more consistent than on bs, and with the girls not slaving to pervecam it is actually very watchable most nights,
They make the best of what they have and still try to put on good TV shows, Lola in the bath a perfect example, if that was on bs it would have been behind the iron curtain on pervecam being watched by about 2 people if they where lucky,
66 should be lorded on her for doing what u see being asked for in the bs thread putting on a proper old school babeshow,
There problem is they have a small roster, so people flicking through the channel see Caty and are like same old boring Caty show and move on, but the girls are most nights putting content out far better than the other two channels,
If they signed 4-5 of the girls being under used by bs I think I would be given 66 a lot more of my time and money,

I agree with you.
S66 has much higher production values than BS, including better lighting and picture quality. Also, S66 girls seem to have more freedom to try stuff out. However as Winshaw points out they need more girls to avoid the over exposure of familiar faces. (Like BS !!!)
I would like to see athletic stunner Atlanta Moreno on this channel. She is underused and over regulated on BS and would positively shine at S66.
I also think is very sad to witness the decline of great performers like Dannii Harwood and Lucy Summers since they joined BS.

Well said. The more exposure Atlanta gets, the better.

^I know S66 generally have the better sets ( apart from the cells ) and the picture quality at present is superior to none, but to suggest moving the likes of Atlanta from BS to S66 is courting disaster. She has been a revelation at BS, mainly for the amount of times she has flashed the gash. When I tune into the babe channels it's not because I want to see fantastic lighting, coupled with a great set ( that's a bonus ), but the chances of seeing some pussy, either deliberately or by accident. At S66 IMO they are paranoid at present with only showing breasts in case of a slip up. Any babe that has recently shown pussy on tv at S66, whether it be by accident or on purpose, has not been asked back. We wouldn't like that to happen to her guys would we.