(09-11-2017 16:12 )Tractor boy Wrote: (09-11-2017 00:10 )lancealot790 Wrote: Murder on the Orient Express (2017) 4/10 - yet another disappointing film, this is a totally unnecessary remake of a near perfect movie. Kenneth Branagh is a poor substitute for Albert Finney, playing the classic detective for laughs and making him seem almost inept. Most of its all star cast are completely wasted and have little to do apart from act shady and wait for the denouncement.
If you have seen the original don't bother with this, if not then seek it out, a real classic.
The problem with this film is that it has been made several times before (with various levels of success) so everyone knows the plot, and everyone knows whodunit.
TB's right for those of us who have seen other versions, a whodunnit where the solution is known by most is a redundant exercise.
I can only guess this is aimed at a generation unfamiliar with previous versions and probably even the books, and to the curious who know the plot but are just interested in seeing how it's reinterpreted (probably not a huge audience ?)
But then it seems like there's been a loss of confidence in the basic source material's ability to engage and hold a new audience ? I can just see the studio bods sitting around going "but it's just a bunch of talking heads in a railway carriage - where's the action ?"
Hence, the (for me) slightly uneasy obligatory CGI avalanche sequences, train perched on rickety bridge, chase / fight sequences etc.
But it's like they didn't have the confidence to go all out and do a full Guy Ritchie/Robert Downey Jnr number on it - so it seems a bit half hearted. I wonder if the Christie Estate baulked at a more fully "action hero Poirot" ?
I have to say I'm not wild about Albert Finney's performance in the 1970s version, I'm not at all sure that film's aged that well.
I wouldn't say Poirot's played for laughs in this new version - there is humour in other adaptations of him, the character's fussiness lends itself to that, but I didn't think the humour was too overdone in this or makes him look inept, I didn't get that.
He has a tendency to mock people and poke fun a bit, but also has a fair bit of seriousness and weight at other points to counterbalance that. I think the film would have been too po-faced overall without some of the humour.
(By contrast,by the time poor old David Suchet got let loose on this for TV, he'd left the his early cheery interpretation of the character behind and they'd decided to make Poirot all fashionably tortured and "dark" and plagued with Catholic guilt, for some reason - Poirot's never remotely religious in the books as far as I recall.
This film doesn't go as far as that , and is the better for it imo.)
So overall flawed yes I'd agree but then I've sat through worse movies.
And it seems to speed by, barely in your seat for 2 hours and that's including all the trailers and adverts.