Do Babeshow Babe's Respect There Callers?

Me?

(25-11-2017 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  (More alphabet soup anyone?! )

<snip>
* Hex!t named the guy as "Paul".

emma c outed him as paul mate.

(25-11-2017 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  (More alphabet soup anyone?! )

Hairbald makes some good wider points... I've spoken about the closeting world of social media on here before. It is quite evidently one of the reasons why less babes post on the forum now than was once the case. Twitter and the rest are far more easily controlled environments and havens for the diva who can surround herself with only an echo chamber of positivity. How easy it must be to believe all your own press in such a world.

I suppose the avoidance of stigma is one of the things motivating the babes in trying to keep the content levels they do in private away from the public-eye... But as I see it, it is the same conceit that I was outling in my previous post that actually brought us to this latest babe rebellion on cam. Look at this...

(22-11-2017 17:22 )babefan2012 Wrote:  ...they never considered what’s happening now happening. It’s incredible naivety from these babes. Whether it’s beyond a pay wall is irrelevant, anything that’s done online or on cam will never stay private 1000%...

Well, for me, it could be called naivete but the mighty vehemence of some of the babes prolonged tweeting on this smacked more of an overwhelming conceit flouted I feel. The babes that have been caught out by this Outlaw dude* (and presumably others of his ilk) sound like they have had their pride knifed, their pomposity pricked, and by, horror of horrors, a lowlife 'saddo' at that. Being caught out by one of the pond scum does not go down well in this sphere.

Thing is these babes were duped and deceived by their own skewed view of their world if I'm any judge. I think it's not that they didn't consider a major upload breach but that they dismissed it because they thought that they controlled, owned, these punters. More, these babes thought they were forever secured, not by fragile technology, but because they believe that they know every joe's mind and think they can always spot a external paypig. They thought their emotional manipulations would always mean they could keep the bigger payers in line. None of these poor losers would be illogical and rebellious enough to give away top content material they'd paid through the nose for - surely... It was a bad misjudgement - with the babes finally being overly emboldened by their self-set, sky high, price tags too.

Maybe someone exploited the exploiters - a guy playing along as just another sucker whilst always having this in mind if he ever felt hard done by or whatever.

Or was this Outlaw even the actual uploader? Maybe it's just as often a pretty please 'private' sharer who does the definitive deed. Not everyone is going to put the same great value on the blurry ass he sees on his file as the babe in question does. (The original recorder is just as dum in this scenario too of course - it only takes one weak link in any sharing chain for stuff to go public.)

So I guess the babes were naive... not over the tech, but in not factoring in their own deceiving sense of overweening superiority when making their cam choices.

* Hex!t named the guy as "Paul".

Have to agree. They did think that they controlled their cammers and saw them as almost unthreatening and highly unlikely to deceive them. There pride is definitely the biggest thing that’s been dented.

(22-11-2017 10:41 )Robot Devil Wrote:  ^ Bingo! It really IS simple: if, ladies, you're shilling yourselves on cam - doing stuff you wouldn't do otherwise - stop. Just stop. If you're so hypocritical that you refuse to PUBLICLY do certain things - whether it's showing your tits/pussy, or going even further - but you WILL gladly do it when lots of money is thrown your way, then you have no reason to piss and moan. So there's a few blurry, slow vids up. End of the world - it ain't. Don't want people seeing what you will do when money is offered up? Then don't do it!

Great post sir. This nails it for me.

Also, it is nothing like revenge porn.

I hope the people on here who are so outraged by people posting the videos don't watch them. That would just be hypocrisy.

(25-11-2017 17:47 )HEX!T Wrote:  

(25-11-2017 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  (More alphabet soup anyone?! )

<snip>
* Hex!t named the guy as "Paul".

emma c outed him as paul mate.

Sorry I didn't know she used that first (I only noted the username Outlaw). I wasn't trying to suggest any form of outing on here. Only that it was additional information. I'll edit that part in any case.

yeah she outed him on her twitter giving his twitter id and name.
like i said not a problem.

I too am skeptical 'revenge porn' applies here but I suspect it makes a good scare tactic warning to their punters.

But seeing as the babes want to apply legal law to their interactions, I hope they go the whole way in wanting to see any scamming punished legally as well

Trouble is if you can't prove it plod won't be very interested
more likely they'll be wasting police time

the question is are people downloading the leaked videos as bad as the person recording the babes in there eyes. for example your on PH or spankbank and you see a video of a babe's cam might be a 5 min video where she shows everything or nothing should you just ignore the video or be allowed to watch it

I wouldn't go near it myself though I have to say you have raised a valid point I suppose watching it is probably just as just bad as watching a pirate DVD of a recently released movie