Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(20-12-2017 15:59 )grantorino Wrote:  but Rebecca and Stella are not 66 girls when we get Lola Knight and Claire Richards doing that type of show then I'd agree with you

(20-12-2017 13:12 )babefan2012 Wrote:  Well the show that 66 did last night with Rebecca and Stella may have been a little to none pussy show but compared to the princess shows of Lucie, Mia and Jasmine i know what i'd rather watch and indeed potentially pay to see more of. Clue its not the Princesses!!!! BS's bs obsession with pervcam and cam is mis matched its litterally all pervcam and nothing else. At least with 66 last night you got a decent free show.

They still are 66 babes. That’s why they’re on there. Lol! Difference between BS and 66 is there’s no pornstars at BS just princesses who believe being topless is on tv for free is beneath them or non open legged babes. BS could still do it but they’d need to ditch the princess route and recruit babes willing to do these type of shows. Lola did open leg when they had technical difficulties a few months back and were online only and no one in a million years would think Clare would do a show like this. The fact is BS don’t have the right babes to do such a show plus they don’t really give a fuck about putting on an enticing show it’s just cold, shallow and heartless. No real enticing in my view. What to see anything well it’ll cost you to even see boobs god knows how much for pussy. I’d say fair play to ST66.

So let me get this right BS girls are divas and S66 girls are not the ones that work 4-6 hours a night

only people to blame for the staleness and thats the producers yet all you do is blame the girls because they are the easy target

(20-12-2017 17:01 )babefan2012 Wrote:  The fact is BS don’t have the right babes to do such a show

I could only name about half a dozen girls

(20-12-2017 17:09 )Charlemagne Wrote:  

(20-12-2017 17:01 )babefan2012 Wrote:  The fact is BS don’t have the right babes to do such a show

I could only name about half a dozen

so hard to find girls who will do pussy shots hmmm have you seen the BSX thread

Yeah but how many of them actually appear on TV? Talking about TV babes here. Atlanta, Jessica Lloyd, Amber Jade, Beth maybe Kiki. Fact is BS’s operating method isn’t really about these sort of babes. Sure they employ porn stars or open legged babes for BSX but not really for Tv. How many have left BS over the last year? A few. Fact is BS don’t really want babes who work to that level as their the babes who are most likely to say fuck this shit, to much hard work. Also people blame the babes more than the producers because in a lot of cases the producers have clearly bent to the babes divaish behaviour. Example being the nightshows experiments of Mia, Jasmine and Lucie who whilst being clearly not the shy type are acting like princesses and divas for thinking being topless for free on tv is beneath them so BS come up with the idea to combine both there love of cam and for trying to make money. Both parties are to blame, I’d just say the babes are more to blame than the producers although not by much.

(20-12-2017 17:06 )HannahsPet Wrote:  ...
only people to blame for the staleness and thats the producers yet all you do is blame the girls because they are the easy target

And some people like to blame people behind the scenes because they are faceless and its easier while letting the babes off scot-free because they are hot!

I'm not sure I would have the blame ratio in favour of the babes as babefan does but there is most definitely collusion and shared interests between babes and bosses that create the sort of lowest effort for biggest return type shows we see too often under the modern babeshow format.

BS aren't always "bent to the babes divaish behaviour", BS have approached the days girls to do nights (cause they need more girls on nights) saying "if you do nights, you don't have to get your tits out", that's BS setting the rules, not the girls.

Agree Shandyhand. There’s definitely collusion between the babes and producers. Maybe me putting the blame more on the babes is wrong. There just seems more control from the babes than producers when it’s probably more producers. Operating purely for financial cam obsession. Not sure really.

(20-12-2017 18:25 )FanofCamilla Wrote:  BS aren't always "bent to the babes divaish behaviour", BS have approached the days girls to do nights (cause they need more girls on nights) saying "if you do nights, you don't have to get your tits out", that's BS setting the rules, not the girls.

Tut Tut mate - using facts as a result of actually picking up the phone and talking to a girl(s). How dare you when non evidential ranting is the style of many.

Merry Xmas by the way

Indeed. But if they could get babes enough babes that would show would they still be turning to non-showing babes? So BS are being forced to give into non-showing babes on some level. But I actually think answer is yes and no, as both parties are accepting of the fact that it actually suits the cam agenda to waterdown part of the fta content.