Is babestation now worse than s66?

S66 have been trouncing BS for the last 2-3 years , but 66 has dramatically widened the gap in the last 12 months, in my judgment. This is because:

1. MAIN REASON: S66 have top and second drawer babes; BS have 3rd 4th and even 5th drawer babes.
   

1. S66 maintain a healthy balance between calls and cams; BS are now a cam service only in all but name
2. BS try to charge the punter for anything remotely alluring or erotic
3. BS has more Rinsers and the whole operation is pro-Rinsing with the customer held in undisguised contempt
4. S66 has far better sets
5. S66 has better production quality
6. S66 has better customer relations
7. S66 innovates and BS usually follows clumsily, late, apishly and in a manner designed to rinse and calculated to alienate customers
   

Viewer's opinions of S66 may be significantly influenced by the platform they watch.
Freeview has only 1 S66 outlet (usually occupied with Lucy Zara etc) versus Sky - which carries all 3 S66 channels.
These compete with 3 Babestation channels on both platforms.
So a Freeview viewer gets a very skewed perception of S66 vs Babestation. They may not ever see the full output of S66.
I.M.O this reflects in BS biased voting in the Forum's annual "Babe of the Year" contest.

It is and its simply down to BS obsession with pervcam and there persistence with non topless shows whenever they can to force the cam side. Mostly been a BS watcher due to not being a sky viewer. Studio have the better babes just, in my opinion.

This threads been going for nearly 3 years and things have drastically changed over this period. CAM's, curtains etc
The Studio66 viewers like to knock Babestation. And the Babestation watchers like to complain about Studio66.
But both are equally guilty about earning money at the forefront of their shows. Viewers don't make them any money

So you can ask the question, but the question could easily be reversed.

I hardly watch S66 as none of the night roster are my type apart from Olivia Paige, i much prefer BS as i like Dannii, Nicole, Ashley, Olivia, Sophie, Maisie, Amber Jade, Daisy Dillon, Alice, Tommie Jo, and Jenna if she's still there

Plus at least BS give new girls and the "lesser names" some solo time and Freeview air time, where as S66 always put the odd new girl and the "lesser names" in DBS and give the over 35s and the likes of Clare, Caty, Ella, Lola and Hannah the solo slot, even if i liked the "big names" on S66 i'd still say the set format they have is fucking stupid

I will give credit to BS for:

POV shows
Shower set
Exotic hosts

(26-12-2017 13:08 )Charlemagne Wrote:  This threads been going for nearly 3 years and things have drastically changed over this period. CAM's, curtains etc
The Studio66 viewers like to knock Babestation. And the Babestation watchers like to complain about Studio66.
But both are equally guilty about earning money at the forefront of their shows. Viewers don't make them any money

So you can ask the question, but the question could easily be reversed.

Totally agree both are guilty but certainly do understand that many viewers can have the position that they don't see the full output of S66 on FV. I doubt S66 could ever double FV output unless they were to kick that pointless magazine into touch I think the less said about said magazine the better.

And do think S66 have the better babes than BS I don't know if BS get any kind of knock on effect when Fern is on S66!

Sick to death of s66 putting Cali Garcia in the schedule and she never shows up!!

I would say it's 50 -50 at fhe moment about which channel is worse

^^ If you look at the Channel Of The Night thread, s66 hasn't been mentioned since April...