Chloe L - BS Nights - Chat & Discussion (Only)

It's beginning to look like BS are now hiring non-topless nightshow babes now for their shows, this is ruining the nightshows man.

Throw's her boobs about on Twitter but not on TV laughable, stick to the day show g.

[quote='darren73' pid='2133184' dateline='1518351785']


But she get's her boobs out on twitter like some other babes who say they are not likely to get them out on tv like Mia

http://babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=72290&page=9
A pic i posted the other day from Bs twitter

Another babe who needs to think before she tweet's
Final note if her shows were more tease in it people would notice the non topless element

Something needs done and said

I think something needs to be done and said about the situation Ofcom should get involved since the concept of the night show is been defeated the babes should only be allowed to do nights if they're willing to get their boobs out

It's simply the babes attitudes and beliefs that anything not behind a £5 a minute paywall is free, when its not free. You're being paid to be there. Sending nudes to men you've just met is free, posting topless or nude pics on twitter is free. Appearing topless on a late night TV sex chat line, ISN'T. Mixed with BS's obsession with cam the two are a potent mix.

Haha!!! The topless pic that was posted on twitter now has BS logos covering the nipples. Just been reposted by BS twitter. Guess someone had a word!! Can't possibly have anything "free"!!!

Well i back Chloe up, she can do what she likes with her own body and if BS allows her to do that in a nightshow then why wouldnt she take advantage of that

I really dont see what the outcry is, there are plenty other woman who choose to go topless on the show, they have an extensive roster and other channels in which these woman appear. On top of that we have thousands of porn sites, thousands of modelling sites and thousands of woman all baring their breasts that you can enjoy. I really dont see how a few woman on one platform not going topless is so heinous

I for one enjoy a good tease and am happy with seeing the daytime girls on the nightshift, you are not losing anything by them not going topless, you are gaining something by them doing tease shows

The whole “there’s others that do that” argument in my mind is weak and glossing over the real issue, which is more and more babes see anything done not behind a £5 minute pay wall is “free”. Also that argument in my opinion is only really useable if talking about open leg or porn, not being topless on a TV sex chat show where a) boobs are allowed and there’s nothing banning them and b) it’s the norm to be topless and others do so why should they be allowed to not be. The whole all inclusive mentality, changing thinks which don’t or shouldn’t be changed to include some. The main issue I and others have is her shows aren’t tease, there’s nothing tease about them. Bra stays permanently on, doesn’t wear anything but plain black non see thru lingerie. It’s not tease it’s just cam advertisement. In fact most of the non topless aren’t tease.

This is amazing you are talking about whether a woman chooses to get her breasts out like it is a constitutional crisis. I mean what are you so angry about? Babestation and the other channels are a business, the babes are business woman modelling is a self employed industry, they are providing you with a service and just like any other job these services come with price tags. You are the customer, you don't owe them any favours and they don't owe you anything. If one of your customers or clients demanded something of you that you were not willing to do, you wouldn't be having it and neither should they.

The decision to go topless is entirely their prerogative, if BS want to host woman on the night shows that chose not to bare their breasts that is their prerogative. It's market principles, if the cliental don't like it they will speak with their money, if the money comes in then the customers are happy and it will continue, you are in the minority and you lose, tough shit. You are entitled to nothing

Just because you throw money at them doesn't mean they have to do what you say, they have the right to decline your money, there are somethings it wont buy. God forbid a woman should do what she wants with her body

Any one seen Liam Payne and this girl in the same room?

(11-02-2018 22:31 )southsidestu Wrote:  This is amazing you are talking about whether a woman chooses to get her breasts out like it is a constitutional crisis. I mean what are you so angry about? Babestation and the other channels are a business, the babes are business woman modelling is a self employed industry, they are providing you with a service and just like any other job these services come with price tags. You are the customer, you don't owe them any favours and they don't owe you anything. If one of your customers or clients demanded something of you that you were not willing to do, you wouldn't be having it and neither should they.

The decision to go topless is entirely their prerogative, if BS want to host woman on the night shows that chose not to bare their breasts that is their prerogative. It's market principles, if the cliental don't like it they will speak with their money, if the money comes in then the customers are happy and it will continue, you are in the minority and you lose, tough shit. You are entitled to nothing

Just because you throw money at them doesn't mean they have to do what you say, they have the right to decline your money, there are somethings it wont buy. God forbid a woman should do what she wants with her body

Everything you said is totally inaccurate.