Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

^^^ Marlowe, are you saying that no one but Caty touches her main camera these days? Are you saying no one has "for years"? Are you saying that Caty is unusual in the amount that she manoeuvres the camera for herself? Are you saying it's a good thing that she does this for herself? That she does so because she has requested it to be this way? Are you saying that any night babe might be best doing without cameraman support?

I'm curious to know how you see these things because I'm trying to see wtf you have felt the need to turn this topic into an argument around things no one has so far has contested. Particularly I'm attempting to pinpoint why you feel this "conversation" doesn't need to be had when it is in fact you that has broadened the subject to the dimension where it might charitably be termed a conversation in the first place!

As I say, your posts defend against points that haven't been made. Neither Rake nor winsaw stated anything that wasn't appropriate to the show in question. Neither has anyone disputed the patently obvious points you make in the your collusions with aaron.

Rake's "always" was at most an emotional overstatement. But perhaps you should try expressing emotional involvement in the shows occassionally instead of pedestrian pedantry, it might make you a better poster.

In short you lot are over reaching in order to indulge in petty personal vendettas once again, it's transparent and I've a feeling no one else can be arsed with it.

(11-07-2018 16:06 )Glenn Miller Wrote:  Some people thought it was odd, but I liked Caty's low camera angle a lot.

I liked it too. I thought it worked well.

I prefer it to the high camera angle.

(11-07-2018 16:17 )DuggyG2 Wrote:  People do want change so all the best to her.

Girls come and go on the shows. Most of the girls who have ever been on the shows must surely have left to do something else.

They have indeed. I won't mind if she goes. But if s66 don't offer her a new contract she'll go on a free transfer lol

(11-07-2018 17:48 )elgar1uk Wrote:  

(11-07-2018 16:17 )DuggyG2 Wrote:  People do want change so all the best to her.

Girls come and go on the shows. Most of the girls who have ever been on the shows must surely have left to do something else.

yep it aint called the babeshow merry-go-round for nothing. most babeshow babes use the shows as stepping stone to do something else and occasionally get on to mainstream tv

Presenters like Alice Goodwin, Ashley Emma, Clare Richards and Cara Brett are probably the best type to add to a roster.

They're already known due to appearing in lads mags and possibly don't need the money from reality TV.

So they'll probably not leave the channels.

Sophie Reade is another example of the type of hosts all channels should get.

WHY does anybody care still?!? The babeshows are beyond shit nowadays so why do some people make such a big deal? ALL the babe channels are worthless and dull now. End of.

What the hell did Studio 66 gain by having a dayshow for 2 hours tonight with Lucy Ann on?

Unless she must be making them money by the looks of it if they don't mind that pointless dayshow on a nightshow.

(12-07-2018 00:20 )Taon777 Wrote:  Unless she must be making them money

Of course it's making them money. Besides it wasn't EXACTLY a dayshow. I only saw her briefly, but the sexual gestures were fairly obvious.

(12-07-2018 00:20 )Taon777 Wrote:  What the hell did Studio 66 gain by having a dayshow for 2 hours tonight with Lucy Ann on?

Unless she must be making them money by the looks of it if they don't mind that pointless dayshow on a nightshow.

She appeared to me to be a fill in until Yasmin turned up.