Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(14-07-2018 09:55 )KerrAvon Wrote:  First time I've watched Jada in a while, seems to have been toned down. Saw her wearing double knickers at one point, what's that all about. Used to do that same school girl skirt thing with barely a hand thong. But we've accepted rubbish as a norm now.

i remember the jada of old on babeworld ,a shadow of the shows back then ,very rare ill watch her nowdays

(14-07-2018 09:55 )KerrAvon Wrote:  First time I've watched Jada in a while, seems to have been toned down. Saw her wearing double knickers at one point, what's that all about. Used to do that same school girl skirt thing with barely a hand thong. But we've accepted rubbish as a norm now.

only fans is the answer to why shes changed so much,
she sent me a message on twitter a few weeks back asking me to delete some tweets in which i had capped her naked, she told me that any content where she is naked is now only allowed on her only fans sight,
she had already banned BSX caps a few weeks before that, some thing she was happy to retweet up until last year,
so sad to see her in 2 pairs of panties for her last to shows, think the chances of seeing her do anything sexy for free are over,

^ What she does has done on TV in the past has NOT for been for free - we need to get away from this babe inspired phrase. She is now shafting BS callers by doing nothing compared to what she did previously - these are the very people who put her in a position to have an Only Fans in the first place.

Anyone who calls a babe that takes up such a stance needs their heads looking at. As do BS for continuing to give her TV shifts if she is doing this openly. They and her future callers are basically enabling in the defeat of the product that brought us to where we are today

(14-07-2018 09:55 )KerrAvon Wrote:  First time I've watched Jada in a while, seems to have been toned down. Saw her wearing double knickers at one point, what's that all about. Used to do that same school girl skirt thing with barely a hand thong. But we've accepted rubbish as a norm now.

Totally agree. Look back only last year when she was wearing thongs that barely covered her pussy. When viewed from behind it would appear that she hadn't got a thong on, so much lips on show covering the strap.

If some presenters want to hide some content behind a paywall, that's fine.

But the content has to be of good quality and worth paying for.

Which most of the time it isn't, whether it be produced by the channels or the presenters themselves.

Most of us aren't paypigs, so wanting stuff that we pay for to be good isn't being disrespectful.

^ The shows have always been about holding back content (well besides the short anything goes period around 2006); the natural extension of the TV regulations and the fact of the shows were founded in tease of varying levels was the establishment of paywalls for the fencing of more explicit content. I have no issue with babes saving content above what's allowed on TV for paid platforms but this is not what's happening here. This is something altogether more corrosive.

This is about the holding back of performance and stylings (poses, angles and types of outfit) just because it suits. Worse, Jada's also kicking away the supports of visual publicity that maintain the industry.

It's pissing on the hand that has feed you because you've had a better offer elsewhere whilst not having the integrity to walk away. She'd rather weaken things for everyone that trys to follow the same route after her. It's a parasitic move; the thin end of the wedge. It's to the detriment of the current shows and a threat to their future.

Just think what this forum might look like in a couple of years if all babes took to following Jada's example.

Trouble is it looks as if BS would rather edge to shifting their entire business model than work to save the shows in any recognisable form. Can you think of another reason why they'd play along with this?

Great lineup tonight! Still would love to see a nude 2-4-1 with Ashley and Atlanta, or another pairing done well.

(14-07-2018 17:43 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ The shows have always been about holding back content (well besides the short anything goes period around 2006); the natural extension of the TV regulations and the fact of the shows were founded in tease of varying levels was the establishment of paywalls for the fencing of more explicit content. I have no issue with babes saving content above what's allowed on TV for paid platforms but this is not what's happening here. This is something altogether more corrosive.

This is about the holding back of performance and stylings (poses, angles and types of outfit) just because it suits. Worse, Jada's also kicking away the supports of visual publicity that maintain the industry.

It's pissing on the hand that has feed you because you've had a better offer elsewhere whilst not having the integrity to walk away. She'd rather weaken things for everyone that trys to follow the same route after her. It's a parasitic move; the thin end of the wedge. It's to the detriment of the current shows and a threat to their future.

Just think what this forum might look like in a couple of years if all babes took to following Jada's example.

Trouble is it looks as if BS would rather edge to shifting their entire business model than work to save the shows in any recognisable form. Can you think of another reason why they'd play along with this?

totally agree

(14-07-2018 17:43 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^ The shows have always been about holding back content (well besides the short anything goes period around 2006); the natural extension of the TV regulations and the fact of the shows were founded in tease of varying levels was the establishment of paywalls for the fencing of more explicit content. I have no issue with babes saving content above what's allowed on TV for paid platforms but this is not what's happening here. This is something altogether more corrosive.

This is about the holding back of performance and stylings (poses, angles and types of outfit) just because it suits. Worse, Jada's also kicking away the supports of visual publicity that maintain the industry.

It's pissing on the hand that has feed you because you've had a better offer elsewhere whilst not having the integrity to walk away. She'd rather weaken things for everyone that trys to follow the same route after her. It's a parasitic move; the thin end of the wedge. It's to the detriment of the current shows and a threat to their future.

Just think what this forum might look like in a couple of years if all babes took to following Jada's example.

Trouble is it looks as if BS would rather edge to shifting their entire business model than work to save the shows in any recognisable form. Can you think of another reason why they'd play along with this?

I completely agree.

Paying £5 a night to access BSX was fine.

Paying £5 a minute to watch a curtain show is not fine.

Presenters toning down their performances will speed up the demise of the channels.

Trouble is the punters who are primarily fuelling the babes & channels now are not ordinary punters who can take their business elsewhere if they feel ripped off, they are more like addicts. They're hooked. The channels & babes are effectively the dealers, who have worked out they can make more money watering down the product so they can sell more of the incresingly impure product. The addict spending more & more to try get the same effect they used to get. And they may never get it.

A rather nasty analogy I admit, but then this has become a very nasty business.