Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Hell yeah Sophie Reade is on tonight again.
But still at this damn no topless nonsense.

Can anyone tell me why her own section is moved it says & i can not go into anything of Sophies chat pics & video section.

Believe me you didn't miss anything mate, she didn't do much, sat prettily, got up a few times, wasn't allowed to go topless nor naked as she did two days ago. I really don't know what their criteria for new girls is on BS but it frustrates the hell out of a lot of people.

(31-08-2018 23:06 )Taon777 Wrote:  Hell yeah Sophie Reade is on tonight again.
But still at this damn no topless nonsense.

Can anyone tell me why her own section is moved it says & i can not go into anything of Sophies chat pics & video section.

I'm having the same thing - can someone tell us what is happening please? Thanks.

(01-09-2018 13:01 )beesfan Wrote:  

(31-08-2018 23:06 )Taon777 Wrote:  Hell yeah Sophie Reade is on tonight again.
But still at this damn no topless nonsense.

Can anyone tell me why her own section is moved it says & i can not go into anything of Sophies chat pics & video section.

I'm having the same thing - can someone tell us what is happening please? Thanks.

Her or her management have asked for the threads to be moved to the fanzone and no caps to be posted - the girls or the companies have this right.

A request was made by BS, we don't have any further information to share, if and when we do, we'll make a post about it, but for now, Sophie's threads are in our fanzones. To access them or any other fanzone thread, go to your Group Memberships, scroll to the relevant section and click on 'join group' beside it, give it a minute or so, then go to whichever section/thread and make sure you can access it, if you do this and then run into problem, PM a mod and we'll look into it for you.

It is odd though that someone who is used to going topless for millions of men readers of Ladsmags can't/won't or not allowed to go topless here at least for a month or two -it's not a past she can sweep under the carpet, her stuff is all over the Net so she can't deny the fact that she is a topless model after being just a very pretty, busty girl who won a reality series eight years ago. The same was of another winner Danielle Bass who was snapped up(on the basis she was topless on Big Brother once or twice) by the Adult Channel to present and/or pose for sexy pictures-where is she now? Sophie is lucky that she has fans that remember her and still looks great.

(02-09-2018 10:49 )GreenMachine Wrote:  It is odd though that someone who is used to going topless for millions of men readers of Ladsmags can't/won't or not allowed to go topless here at least for a month or two -it's not a past she can sweep under the carpet, her stuff is all over the Net so she can't deny the fact that she is a topless model after being just a very pretty, busty girl who won a reality series eight years ago. The same was of another winner Danielle Bass who was snapped up(on the basis she was topless on Big Brother once or twice) by the Adult Channel to present and/or pose for sexy pictures-where is she now? Sophie is lucky that she has fans that remember her and still looks great.

It's probably about making sure that Babestation make as much money as possible out of Sophie appearing on it, which is understandable.

Re Big Brother, something that very well illustrates your point though is that it was Michelle Bass, not Danielle. How many BB contestants do people remember, even six months after the show? Even more so since the lads' mags went.

The ladsmags snapped quite a few winners like Shell Jubin, Vanessa someone and that black girl who was pretty hot. Now they have disappeared it is newspapers that want winners who look good or those airheads from TOWIE and Made in Chelsea with the brain capacity of a peanut and attention span of a moth.

I notice they were offering topless pictures of her in the screen corner advert, so it does just seem to be a case of having to pay at the moment if you want to see that.

Yes it seems to be about monetising anything vaguely erotic and eking it out as long as possible, and trying to create pent-up demand so people will pay disproportionately for something that was freely available a few short months back...