Studio66 & OnlyFans

(22-10-2018 17:26 )HannahsPet Wrote:  the way to make sure onlyfans doesnt become a issue is to pay your girls well and make sure they can earn without it.

Hahahah!

What a deluded fanboy comment. Most of these girls were making a mint even before OnlyFans. No matter how much money they were paid they would still take more money if they could get it because anyone would.

(22-10-2018 18:36 )msgny72 Wrote:  Yes because regardless of what the assorted "characters" before say they ARE employees

No they aren't employees. And they don't want to be employees. It would destroy their business model at a stroke.

(22-10-2018 18:36 )msgny72 Wrote:  And if any of the girls are reading this start billing S66 for your lingerie, make up and hair styling. See what reaction you get then.

They would be out of work. That's what reaction they would get.

(22-10-2018 18:36 )msgny72 Wrote:  By not demanding anything from previous sources of external income they have set a precedent so can't demand any from this. It's no different to websites, magazine work, video, promotions work etc etc.

It may be no different to you, but that means you haven't managed to understand why OnlyFans has become such a problem for the channels.

I still think the babes were right to stand up to the management and told them to shoe it with the their 30% demand. I think even if they sacked them and restarted with new girls in the end that contract would still be in existence and probably any new girls they hired with OF pages probably would feel the same way.
If that proved to be the case, the babes then who worked for S6 probably could also have a case for unfair dismissal, and even under current conditions if they are being forced to choose between S66 and OF.
How much longer will S66 survive in this current situation?

(23-10-2018 04:44 )babelover48 Wrote:  could also have a case for unfair dismissal

How many times do you need to be told?

A self-employed person can't be dismissed, whether unfairly or otherwise.

In order to be dismissed you need to be employed in the first place.

(23-10-2018 04:44 )babelover48 Wrote:  I think even if they sacked them and restarted with new girls in the end that contract would still be in existence and probably any new girls they hired with OF pages probably would feel the same way.

Yes, but that's not the same thing as having the goalposts moved after you've been hired.

(23-10-2018 05:32 )tony confederate Wrote:  

(23-10-2018 04:44 )babelover48 Wrote:  could also have a case for unfair dismissal

How many times do you need to be told?

Someone needs to go back to bed.

You're taking this very personally. Some of you seem overly protective of S66 which is odd because for the other 99% of the year you're slagging it off.

It's nearly Panto season so

THEY ARE EMPLOYEES

He's behind you.

(23-10-2018 06:23 )msgny72 Wrote:  THEY ARE EMPLOYEES

The entire concept of self-employment seems to elude you, doesn't it

The self-employed aren't required to pay someone in order to work for them or told who they can work for elsewhere.

(23-10-2018 05:50 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(23-10-2018 04:44 )babelover48 Wrote:  I think even if they sacked them and restarted with new girls in the end that contract would still be in existence and probably any new girls they hired with OF pages probably would feel the same way.

Yes, but that's not the same thing as having the goalposts moved after you've been hired.

how many times have S66 moved the goalposts since this blew up? ONCE. And IMO they moved them a fair way & who's to say if they moved again if they restarted, rebranded and hired new girls who didn't know what had gone on before they were hired?

S66 won't panic, they've still got Ella Jolie so who cares who leaves?