^ I have no wish to prolong this debate overly but feel there is a need for a alternative perspective on all this here.
Generally, as punters we have to decide which type of fan we are. Are we content to judge a babe's shows
only by her own recent standards or do we look elsewhere for comparisons on what a given babe's sessions might be? Specific to the individual babe, this might depend on each guy's innate sympathy for the babe in question - particularly as it relates to her perceived attitudes and/or public persona. In short, a guy can be more forgiving to his favourite's visuals than to those of a babe he cares less for. This is natural and highly predictable behaviour.
Then too, it can easily be guessed which type of stance most babes would favour in their interactors; and indeed which they might openly encourage in those they converse with.
Indeed, a significant number of babes have expressed a dislike for their shows being compared to those of other girls over the years. It is as if to do so is to deny these babes their agency over their own shows. To suggest that any sort of common level of visual service should be expected by punters, for each level of payment they provide, is somehow too much to ask.
In any objective view this can only be seen, in large part, for the bluster it is. No, some decent consistent level to the visual part of a babe's performance must be maintained through her sessions and it is reasonable to base this in the context of current day, night or tease shows (whichever the babe is doing) as a whole.
Where some such babes (day babes in particular) may have a minor point is in the fact that not all of them want or, more pertinently, need to appeal to the same sorts of customer. For instance, if a babe has a huge list of content fanboys willing to pay, basically, just to listen to her and be heard by her then why would she feel the need to provide for more visual orientated guys (paying or not) that might only turn up on occassion expecting 'the works' the minute they hit her stream?
So, no again, no matter the validity of the specific complaints against a babe (and it has to be said Eve has been self-limiting on set and pose in daytime proper for years) context has to play its part here. For me, it is only as more visuals gain a regular foothold in such a babe's sessions that a punter is allowed to be more expectant and 'demanding' in looking for them. (And it ought to be obvious that the more successful a babe is at one thing the harder it is to convert her to something else.)
Evelyn like all babes has her regular punter's dictate her shows where present. If anyone has a grouse with what she is doing visually I suggest they try to jump onboard at a point where things most approach what they are looking for and try to spread and enhance things from there. IMO, Eve has shown herself one of the fanboy-focused babes most open to constructive criticism and a drift towards a more visual orientated form on 66 days over the past year. (It has become crystal clear she reads these pages and acts in response where she can.)
Your average mainstream punter can't complain overly about boring fanboys 'holding her back' unless he is perpared to be seen to be putting his money where his mouth is in pushing for what he wants. It is not like Eve is lazy doing nothing as some babes evidently are/have been. So the question becomes why does the complainer think his money, and ideas for a good show, should trump those that are actually doing the paying atm?