Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

I have no objection to any show as long as it's quality is high.
Over to Brooklyn.............

(02-03-2019 16:40 )southlondonphil Wrote:  

(02-03-2019 13:07 )SawBoss Wrote:  It seems some girls want the money from nights but aren't willing to work the hours

Heather's already working a 12 hour shift from 2pm to 2am. How many more hours do you expect her to work exactly?

She doesn't HAVE to be doing the extra tease stuff, she's doing it no doubt, because the money makes it worth it. They weren't short of girls last night either so she might as well just do a proper night shift - it's not much longer than doing a 4 hour tease.
All I was saying is, why not just do tease HOUR then stop? Let other girls have more time on screen/more time solo?

People complain they need new faces but then they get them, they barely get shifts as it is, let alone with the increasing amount of 3-5 hour long tease shows.

(03-03-2019 12:11 )winsaw Wrote:  ^^ not sure I see the point in one off special as that's not going to rally help 66 in the long run to grow,
The other porn stars they have booked off late Amber, Honer and Ella have all said they want to do regular TV shows and shown commitment to 66 want to grow there TV fan base this is what 66 should be looking for,
I don't doubt she will do good numbers but what's the point if she's not going to repeat it should stick to the girls who want to work for 66 after the porn ban is over

Brooklyn will likely bring in double the revenue in one night that the regulars normally do. Studio 66 is ultimately a business and it's a good money making move. Don't understand your argument about they should stick to girls who want to do regular shows, you might have a point if S66 had a stacked night show roster and Brooklyn was bumping girls off the rota but the reality is even with all the new positive signings S66 have made recently their night roster is still not particularly deep.
It's a one off that will make S66 lots of money and attract new viewers potentially, can't see any real negatives to it.

(03-03-2019 12:49 )SawBoss Wrote:  She doesn't HAVE to be doing the extra tease stuff, she's doing it no doubt, because the money makes it worth it. They weren't short of girls last night either so she might as well just do a proper night shift - it's not much longer than doing a 4 hour tease.
All I was saying is, why not just do tease HOUR then stop? Let other girls have more time on screen/more time solo?

People complain they need new faces but then they get them, they barely get shifts as it is, let alone with the increasing amount of 3-5 hour long tease shows.

i have to disagree as Heather dose a proper night show, you cant call what she dose a tease so its there for not a waste of a night shift, if we where talking about Gigi then i would fully agree with you,
also worth noting that the 2 newbies got far more solo time lastnight then they would had they been in with a full night girl like Jenn who would have been solo all night the the newbies would have been dbs all night,
i think by having a night girl finishing at 2 it gave the other 2 the best chance to shine they can get at 66,

(03-03-2019 15:11 )Couping Wrote:  Brooklyn will likely bring in double the revenue in one night that the regulars normally do. Studio 66 is ultimately a business and it's a good money making move. Don't understand your argument about they should stick to girls who want to do regular shows, you might have a point if S66 had a stacked night show roster and Brooklyn was bumping girls off the rota but the reality is even with all the new positive signings S66 have made recently their night roster is still not particularly deep.
It's a one off that will make S66 lots of money and attract new viewers potentially, can't see any real negatives to it.

i totally agree with you mate that she will make lots of money, only point i was making was surly they are better off giving shifts to those porn girls who will make just as much money but have committed to do it on a regular basis, thats got to be better business,
dont get me wrong very happy to see her, just think they would be better getting her to do more shows

I'd rather see more of Heather and as little as possible of Ashlyn

(03-03-2019 15:38 )winsaw Wrote:  

(03-03-2019 15:11 )Couping Wrote:  Brooklyn will likely bring in double the revenue in one night that the regulars normally do. Studio 66 is ultimately a business and it's a good money making move. Don't understand your argument about they should stick to girls who want to do regular shows, you might have a point if S66 had a stacked night show roster and Brooklyn was bumping girls off the rota but the reality is even with all the new positive signings S66 have made recently their night roster is still not particularly deep.
It's a one off that will make S66 lots of money and attract new viewers potentially, can't see any real negatives to it.

i totally agree with you mate that she will make lots of money, only point i was making was surly they are better off giving shifts to those porn girls who will make just as much money but have committed to do it on a regular basis, thats got to be better business,
dont get me wrong very happy to see her, just think they would be better getting her to do more shows

Brooklyn will bring in more money than Ella for example because it's a one off (novelty factor), also many would consider Brooklyn more physically attractive and with a dirtier attitude. We'll see.

(02-03-2019 21:57 )M-L-L Wrote:  ^ Just an idea to throw into the ring, but also sometimes the performers who don't look like they're doing very much visually can be the best at talking absolute filth on the phones.

Yes, quite.

*cough-ellajolie*

(02-03-2019 21:57 )M-L-L Wrote:  ^ Just an idea to throw into the ring, but also sometimes the performers who don't look like they're doing very much visually can be the best at talking absolute filth on the phones.

Yes, quite.

I think Lolly Badcock represents the ultimate proof of this point.

(04-03-2019 12:09 )woolleysheep Wrote:  Yes, quite.

I think Lolly Badcock represents the ultimate proof of this point.

Lolly did throw herself about as well to be fair