Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion

I turned her on last night and she had her tits out and slowly bouncing up and down and i will tell you it was pretty damn sexy i would have rubbed one out but i was eating a sausage roll at the time....

(21-05-2019 12:13 )Didokan Wrote:  name a girl who can fill her space (her good looking and gorgeous body) that can keep her schedules right for a year at least . It's so wrong to say that Clare should leave , I mean she's getting even sexier from her early career, other than that , just enjoy other girls with ugly low price fake tits with a man like skinny asses .

Not denying she's still as hot as she was when she first came on the scene, as a performer she's slowly regressed over the past few years to the level of boring.

You bang on about fake tits and skinny asses yet S66 have acquired both Ashlyn and Kendall this year, both natural girls who are 100 times better than what Clare is nowadays.

Watching Ashlyn last night and comparing her to Clare, you had Ashlyn almost naked at her energetic best, then you had Clare laying down dressed all in black.

Yet some of you guys want to defend that

(21-05-2019 09:35 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  

(21-05-2019 00:53 )Pspotter Wrote:  Fully agree with Liverred.

Why on earth are S66 still employing her, she past her sell by date a year or two ago.

Simple, she’s still bringing in plenty of calls etc for s66. If she wasn’t, s66 would get rid of Clare

That's absolute piffle! Clare is the least "occupied on the phone" of all the S66 presenters. When she isn't watering the plants or eating, she is constantly chatting to the backroom staff. The evidence is in plain sight.
Your regular excuse for any S66 babe criticised by this forum, is to say that they must be 'profitable' or S66 (being the proven astute business experts that we all know!) - would get rid of them. So Clare's is so "in-demand" that she justifies 2/3 appearances per week is she? Sorry - in my opinion she is only there because of favouritism from the S66 management. for whatever reason.

The real question is.... what do you actually look for when watching any of the tv girls?
Because in all truth i think some of you guys expect to much

A show of willingness and a show of energy, Clare in particular offers neither.

Has Clare always been like that?

(21-05-2019 18:35 )Lynx Wrote:  The real question is.... what do you actually look for when watching any of the tv girls?

The short answer?
For them to achieve a level of performance history often tells us has been readily reached in times gone by without any hint of breaking the rules.
No nightshow babe seems further away from their highest of standards set long ago than Clare. That breaks my nightshow heart when bearing in mind just what an astonishing beautiful creature she has been and still remains .

(21-05-2019 19:46 )Pspotter Wrote:  A show of willingness and a show of energy, Clare in particular offers neither.

Do you call her and try to get her to show "energy" then or do you just sit there watching?

I'm in no way saying I've called (because I haven't) but for all we know she could be everything you ever wanted if you phoned her. If she's bad on the phones then I guess an argument could be raised.....

Until someone says what she's like on the phones then all this is, is just petty talk tbh

I would eat her bogies

(21-05-2019 20:20 )Lynx Wrote:  Do you call her and try to get her to show "energy" then or do you just sit there watching?

I'm in no way saying I've called (because I haven't) but for all we know she could be everything you ever wanted if you phoned her. If she's bad on the phones then I guess an argument could be raised.....

Until someone says what she's like on the phones then all this is, is just petty talk tbh

Why would I call when she's giving me nothing on air.

Last night for example all she's doing is laying there dressed all in black, that gives me no motivation to call her.

I'd rather spend my money elsewhere on someone like Ashlyn or Lola who actually show willingness and energy.