Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 95 Vote(s) - 3.97 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion

Author Message
Lynx Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 363
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation: 15
Post: #5181
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(21-05-2019 20:38 )Pspotter Wrote:  Why would I call when she's giving me nothing on air.

Last night for example all she's doing is laying there dressed all in black, that gives me no motivation to call her.

I'd rather spend my money elsewhere on someone like Ashlyn or Lola who actually show willingness and energy.

It's each to there own I guess, cos I thought she looked pretty hot in her black cat suit. Didn't bother me at all that she left it on

Cara Brett & Ashley Emma what a dream
21-05-2019 20:42
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pspotter Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 798
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 15
Post: #5182
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
But it's a nightshow mate, what she produced you might as well bang her on daytime.

Guess you're just a fan of mediocrity.
21-05-2019 20:51
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
valleyfarmman Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 173
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 5
Post: #5183
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Your first sentence here is fine.
Your second is arrogant and misplaced.
I thought the aim of these forums was for people to have reasoned, grown-up and articulate discussion of the babe shows? Slinging mud and saying ‘I don’t agree with you so you are wrong’ is surely not on? Moderators?
21-05-2019 21:34
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pspotter Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 798
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 15
Post: #5184
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Bounce

He said he enjoyed watching her doing nothing, she's a mediocre performer, therefore he's a fan of mediocrity.

Am I wrong?
21-05-2019 21:43
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
valleyfarmman Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 173
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 5
Post: #5185
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
He didn’t say that. Read his post again.
And yes, you’re wrong.
21-05-2019 21:57
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pspotter Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 798
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 15
Post: #5186
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
"Didn't bother me at all that she left it on"

That's basically saying "I enjoyed watching her doing nothing".

She's been mediocre for ages.

And how am I wrong? She's not been good recently has she?
21-05-2019 22:20
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Goatman Offline
King Of Goats
*****

Posts: 5,943
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation: 70
Post: #5187
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Clare bends over a desk better than anybody
21-05-2019 22:25
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
valleyfarmman Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 173
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 5
Post: #5188
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Jesus, I hope you’re not in the legal profession. You’ll go very hungry.

‘I put it to the jury that the defendant was wearing clothes and therefore this means they did nothing’.

To try and calm the waters. Earlier today I posted that I enjoyed her show last night (plenty of flesh on show and I thought it was her best show for about 3 months) but acknowledged that she isn’t the performer she used to be. So we’re on the same page on that front and I’ll leave it there.
21-05-2019 22:33
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lynx Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 363
Joined: Jun 2018
Reputation: 15
Post: #5189
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(21-05-2019 22:20 )Pspotter Wrote:  
(21-05-2019 21:57 )valleyfarmman Wrote:  He didn’t say that. Read his post again.
And yes, you’re wrong.

"Didn't bother me at all that she left it on"

That's basically saying "I enjoyed watching her doing nothing".

She's been mediocre for ages.

And how am I wrong? She's not been good recently has she?

So getting fully naked then is basically all your interested in? Fair enough, if that what you're after then fine that's what you would prefer.
Personally I like the tease aspect, always have, now that doesn't mean I don't like seeing her full on nude, but for example when she's in a dress it's exciting for me when does flashes of her peach and half pulls it up her body....

Like I said, people have there own likes/expectations/opinions, but just because you don't like it doesn't mean everyone else will think the same. If the world worked that way then we may as well all be on a farm and be sheep.

Cara Brett & Ashley Emma what a dream
22-05-2019 05:26
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pspotter Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 798
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 15
Post: #5190
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Did I say that? No I didn't.

But really that's what nightshows should be about, who wants to tune in to see Clare just laying there dressed fully clothed like she was looking like a complete bore, that's something you'd expect to see on daytime.

As for the tease aspect there's far better girls who do it better than Clare nowadays, Rebecca Kelly and Jamie Jones' tease shows are more exciting than what Clare offers.

Each to their own and all that but I prefer a trier, someone who is willing to show us what a nightshow should be like, Clare used to do it, not anymore.
22-05-2019 08:15
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply