Elite TV/Studio66 Daytime - Discussion Thread

The roster is so weak and lacking quality now.

Even though S66 have a nominal TV presence still, there's not the cachet any longer of the TV presence and high profile they once had, which attracted ambitious aspiring WAGS and models.

The focus downmarket, on camming, has inevitably led to a distinct drop in quality and calibre of presenter. This is compounded by the multiple formats and cams and venues (Studio or home) diluting the experience still further.

Gone down the shitter mate. I’m sorry but they’ve got some of the most unattractive girls on there now.

(13-11-2019 12:25 )Rake Wrote:  The roster is so weak and lacking quality now.

Even though S66 have a nominal TV presence still, there's not the cachet any longer of the TV presence and high profile they once had, which attracted ambitious aspiring WAGS and models.

The focus downmarket, on camming, has inevitably led to a distinct drop in quality and calibre of presenter. This is compounded by the multiple formats and cams and venues (Studio or home) diluting the experience still further.

I used to spend a lot on day calls and a reasonable amount on cams but minimal interest and expenditure from me for the channel now.

As you say poorer quality presenters (agree that's open to personal taste) due to the more open market on cam, erratic technology making camming a lottery for guys, multiple formats and the inevitable loss of TV channels soon, plus numerous girls now left or leaving because they don't like the way the channel is going / changing or the boss has moved on or the way the earnings are structured.

So yes the overall diluting of the experience...

The boss obviously left because the company has gone to shams. Doubt studio66 will be around much longer

If this channels makes it to the end of the year I'll be amazed.

(13-11-2019 12:25 )Rake Wrote:  ... The focus downmarket, on camming, has inevitably led to a distinct drop in quality and calibre of presenter. This is compounded by the multiple formats and cams and venues (Studio or home) diluting the experience still further.

^ Two posters were instantly on the ball with issues surrounding this further upthread...

(27-10-2019 16:57 )Bandwagon Wrote:  Using a channel as a shop window is interesting because it sacrifices the one thing that separates S66 from the likes of MFC.

(27-10-2019 18:27 )coolman7 Wrote:  What attracted me to the babe channels many years ago and still to this day is the different sets, multiple outfits the girls wear, watching them interact with each other which I know is rare now and the energy and style each babe would bring to her performance. If it has gotten to the point of a babe laying on a bed in her dingy spareroom looking bored at home then you can count me the fuck out

Essentially this is the same great point expressed in different ways... To be explicit: What sets a babeshow and its babe apart if she isn't provided the cachet of a proper individualised showcase TV channel? The elevation of regular slots on national TV in amongst other high spec'ed channels, all featuring similiarly top quality babes, is in no way to be sniffed at ...

Coolman then hits on the associated componder, as does Rake, recently dressed up for us as further 'innovation': Cut-rate home camming as supposedly high-end fta streams. The central problem with the latter change is that doing too many of these type shows (and most often doing them in a drab non-energetic style of a babe idling her Sunday away in her back bedroom to boot), is that the mystique of these formerly heralded TV babes is thoroughly dissipated by it.

The babes of Danica's era (say) seemed like sparklingly unobtainable 10's - some guys even managed to call them goddesses. More and more these days the babes, I hate to say it, begin to resemble next door's housewives - exposed as they are by overly frank social media presences and, now, brought low by the prospect of being continually surrounded by the trappings of ordinary suburbia every day. (The poor lighting and poor quality cam settings so many babes have started these shows with is of no help either.) Guys want the shows to feature aspirational women they can escape to, not more of the sights and sounds (and aggro) of home...

Once again 66 risk throwing the baby out with the bath water with all these cost savings. I'm sure they are necessary to them but, regrettably, they only continue the multi-faceted erosion of those elements that made the shows special to the observer in the first place. That's a process that can't continue unabated forever; something has to give... OR the babes have to learn to compete in a whole other fashion with the level they now occupy. (And there are a lot of things CB and MFC babes do so routinely that it appears their new rivals wont even give houseroom to.)

I would be very surprised if this channel stays from 2020 on wards. Also I've been watching it since 2013 since I got interested in them when I was 18 years old back then they had some much potential and variety of babes etc. Now it's like it's on a life support system and I fear it will have the same fate as RLC.

I'd agree that there's a "fire sale" feel to the channel lately, but I can't foresee them going to the wall as fast as all that.

Given my experience in several companies, as a result of personnel changes I would expect S66's output to appear turbulent for some time.
How long? Well my company was bought six years ago and it still can't achieve was was accomplished routinely before.
I don't subscribe to the view that it will close before Christmas and so on.
I think that it's difficult to judge. I read one negative post and then one that's full of praise.

Personally there was a time when i used to record all the morning/days/afternoon shows{for my own enjoyment]that was back in the day when i found certain babes dayshows hotter than watching the nightshows can't recall the last time i recorded anything now and have since found reading the forum pages more interesting than watching s66tv dayshows,can honestly say i stopped watching since the risk factor of nip-slips was eliminated