I debated whether to write anything here about last night's Tip Goal. Doing so in the hope of changing certain mindsets at 66 seems ever more like pissing in the wind when you consider the ambivalence Lola's particular prod/cameraman showed in the moment for everything that was being said on chat. (I've no doubt there was plenty more guys held themselves back from writing more out of respect for the babe.)
I decided to post this mainly because the segment offered so many angles on the issues surrounding 66's tactics (there's a lot to cover I'm sorry
) and in particular brought to my attention one issue I've not seen covered at all on the forum as yet. (As ever it comes down to writing stuff on these threads for no one but ourselves in the hope that greater awareness leads to more empowered choices on our interactions should 66 try to hold the current hard line on this.)
Number one: I will, most certainly, be very, very, wary of taking part in
any of 66 's tip goals after this, my first hands on experience of them. I'm so glad I only tested the waters with a minimal £20 contribution to the goal.
Anyway, here's my quick thoughts on the more straightforward areas of concern...
- It now seems to me highly likely that some insiders at 66 are so intent on winning the battleground of double dipping (ensuring perv remains a big part of fulfilments) that they are prepared to risk losing some tip custom over it. They are not going to accept a standard of babes doing these things to main camera alone very easily.
- Stemmw's observations on the pattern of these goings on over Lola's goals looks very valid at this point. It was clear there was a hardliner bts giving Lola direction on how this was going down at certain points. Punters would therefore do well to consider during WHICH shifts they should place their money on these goals... that is if they are at all interested in how the device will be used going forward (bear in mind production teams can switch days of course).
- The use of the lame old "xxx" and "unrestricted" tags in the goal title didn't bother me as much as it did some on chat. We should KNOW these things are a come on by now, and allow for same when making our buying choices.
- What made this goal totally unsatisfying for me was that the insistence focus on the ubiquitous perv killed all momentum from Lola's movements. I'd actually much rather a short fulfilment period of quality over a draw out one of occassional tepid heat.
- But then 66 are clearly intent on drawing out every period after a goal total is hit as much as poss - in the hope that guys will spend more money while hanging around waiting for the goal to play out. I'd be resisting buying into this tactic as much as possible as it'll only encourage more of the same behaviour from them.
Finally, one more troublesome thought came to me as I mulled over what occured here... (not saying this definitely happened btw but only that the way 66 are doing this is an open invitation to such things...)
Say I'm a wealthy punter with a kink; what gets me off with an extra buzz is the ego trip of lording it over my fellow punters, generally making a babe experience all about me alone, as well as causing shit in chat... I add to the tip goal heavily to get it done, knowing I can get my jollies in my way if I play my cards right. When fulfilment starts I jump on and off perv without a word getting the babe's prime attention for extended periods (because 66 just can't resist looking for extra cash) and disrupting everything in just the way that pulls at my plonker. I alone am a happy larry at this, while everyone else is left scratching their heads thinking wtf was that!
There are clearly guys like this in the scene, we've all encountered them and here are 66 allowing them the space to do their thing with anonymity and impunity in ripe fashion. Problematic counter productive behaviour pandered to by over reaching production. Just one more of so many accusations 66 left themselves wide open to last night...
All because they can't let something that should be brief, positive and straightforward just
be without trying to have it all ways at once.