Stemmw
Beebo. Want. Cuddles
Posts: 12,454
Joined: Apr 2019
Reputation: 50
|
RE: Europe, Referendum & Brexit (formerly Europe..IN or OUT??)
(01-02-2020 00:42 )GMach1 Wrote: Not true you can't become one directly after the other-type 1 diabetes you are born with and it can surface in early to later life-type II is to do with poor diet and unealthy lifestyle and is more frequently diagnosed-I had that and I managed to somehow reverse it - took me six years mind you, and I assure you I didn't get type 1 after that.
Type 1 diabetes is an auto immune disease, unavoidable and like GM said a person is born with it, just genetics unfortunately. Type 2 is due to lifestyle, very avoidable and with the right lifestyle changes can be managed and in some cases some of the symptoms can be reversed.
As for Garnye's point about people using up health services due to their avoidable unhealthy lifestyles, bad diets, drinking, smoking, eating excessively etc. I would completely agree with him, but on the rare occasions when a government attempts to bring in positive legislation and regulations to attempt to remedy these they are accused of over reaching/nanny state/infringing personal liberties and personal choice etc.
The classic ones are sugar tax and minimum pricing of alcohol. Not saying these would necessarily work (probably a marginal benefit) but people against these ideas always trot out the "oh no how will all those poor, less well off people cope, it will cost them too much". Very patronising.
"If nothing we do matters ..... , then all that matters is what we do"
"Reason is not automatic, those who deny it cannot be conquered by it"
"Doth mother know you weareth her drapes"
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2020 01:13 by Stemmw.)
|
|
01-02-2020 01:13 |
|
hornball
Posting Machine
Posts: 4,123
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 22
|
RE: Europe, Referendum & Brexit (formerly Europe..IN or OUT??)
(01-02-2020 00:28 )southsidestu Wrote: (31-01-2020 22:52 )garnye Wrote: (31-01-2020 21:45 )southsidestu Wrote: when the NHS still is being underfunded despite the pledge of £350 million a week
this still irritates me, irritating because at the time it was "pledged" it was pledged by people who were in no position to make that decision. it wasn't a promise, it was a comparison of what was being spent in the eu compared to what theoretically could have been done with it if the uk left the eu. it should have been completely ignored, and was ignored by the smarter folk. the dumb folks are the ones that voted based on that pledge. nothing of the sort was ever going to happen, those who pledged it knew that and preyed on the stupidity of the public to believe it was going to happen. which leads me on to another point which might, and hopefully will, annoy some people - i have a few people in my family who work for the nhs, 2 pharmacists and a GP, and they believe the same as i do that whilst funding the nhs could be better, it isn't actually the problem, it's a symptom of the problem, 2 problems infact. one is overpopulation, and the other which is the bigger issue, is that the majority of people relying on the nhs are people who have done it to themselves through poor decisions. older people and to some extent immigrants are still blamed for problems in the nhs which is ridiculous. the biggest problem is people eating and smoking and drinking and drugging themselves into GP's and A&E and hospitals. If (able bodied) people actually took responsibilty and ate healthily and got some physical activity then the nhs, for the most part, would be left for people that actually need it. this would create a knock on effect of better conditions, more space, more money for research and many other things. i'm tired of the nhs being used as a political pawn when the nhs is actually manageable as it is, at least for now until the population increases beyond a certain point
Our healthcare system would definitely benefit from moving from a treatment based model to a model of prevention. As stated in an earlier post diabetes will, in the coming decades, account for nearly a fifth of the NHS budget, most cases of diabetes are type 2 which tend to (I don't know if exclusive or not) come from lifestyle. As for those who are type 1 many (again I don't know an exact number) become type 1 after originally being type 2.
Treatment models for the NHS are not really Brexit related so I will stop there
The two surely go hand - in - hand!! Of course 'prevention' has as much to do with self discipline of the individual, than anything else. I am moving - given the strain on the NHS (and it's sensational staff) - towards accepting a certain level of 'refusal of treatment' in strictly limited circumstances where - despite advice and help from the NHS - people refuse to change their lifestyles to help themselves!! I may be unpopular, but I would reduce IVF cycles to one as well!!
Despite the best intentions, and preventative treatments, the fact remains - obviously - that no measures taken, will stop the reality of illness!
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2020 11:23 by hornball.)
|
|
01-02-2020 11:19 |
|
GMach1
Account Closed
Posts: 14,492
Joined: Jul 2018
|
RE: Europe, Referendum & Brexit (formerly Europe..IN or OUT??)
One final thing with type 2 you MUST keep your feet clean and get regular checks of the pulse and the touch, in other words if you got a scratch or stepped on something and didn't know about it things could escalate and that is why people end up amputating limbs. I still need checks even though I reversed it but my mother who also had it due to weight not diet.
LIVERPOOL-Champions League & UEFA Super Cup AND
Club World Cup Winners 2019-YNWA!
So long, farewell, auf weidersehn, goodbye, adieu, syonara, ha su chin and CHEERIO!
|
|
01-02-2020 13:51 |
|