Lucky Lorenzo - Babestation Nights - Chat & Discussion

Funny we still have Victorian values about public hair, never seems to change, but Lucky is better on the web where she can get naughtier which suits her persona.

Agree winsaw it’s disappointing that ofcom have reinstated the pussy hair ban. Agree, surely bs would have spoken to Lucky first that she was breaking this ofcom rule, if they did & Lucky carried on breaking this rule, then Lucky deserves having her remaining shifts for this month taken off her, If they didn’t, then it’s harsh they’ve taken Lucky’s shifts off her or just kept her on cam for the rest of this month

So that would mean if Scarlett Jones flashed hers(she did constantly last year, God was it hot) like Lucky had accidentally done, she would have been fired. bloody mad!

How can BS take this stance against Lucky for showing her landing strip,when over on XpandedTV certain babes have theirs on show nearly all night ,how can it be okay for one channel and deemed taboo at another channel

Her twitter seems to have been deactivated. I wonder if her tweet has caused more problems

(11-02-2020 21:47 )SecretAgent Wrote:  Her twitter seems to have been deactivated. I wonder if her tweet has caused more problems

It wasn't a tweet it was from her Onlyfans
her twitter is still there

https://twitter.com/LuckyLuxe5

(11-02-2020 12:04 )GMach1 Wrote:  Funny we still have Victorian values about public hair ...

'We' (the public - on average) really don't. It's just Ofcom (and the government/authorities in general) are trying to persuade us there's a problem and we ought to think their way to suit their own reactionary and backward looking power play.

Please don't give them validation. Seriously can you imagine an Ofcom rep standing up in court and trying to argue anyone could even "potentially" (Ofcom love that word because they see it as freedom to bullshit) be harmed by the sight of Lucky's pubes on TV?

These sniffy quango seat warmers are a throwback to the bygone age of Mary Whitehouse. Their language may be different - justifications reimagined for the identity politics age - but they should be laughed at in the same way Whitehouse was at the end. What's the real difference? It's the same judgemental 'we know what's best for you' moralising. They shouldn't be given houseroom; they and their warped views of what is dangerous in this world deserve none. But the general public are unaware and/or blase about their creeping censorship regime and stealth propaganda; so they will continue to act, and continue to be emboldened, until they come for something enough people find important.

The government bit off more than they could chew with AV but they will continue with other 'victories' in this vein before they're all found out for a proper reversal.

Do we even know for sure it was Ofcom rules, and not Bs's own rules?

Shands if you run for election I'd vote for you. Agree with that and this time I was with you right up to the end word Consider how many times Scarlett was allowed to flash her bush at us-what a difference a year makes-AGAIN!

(12-02-2020 00:20 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  Do we even know for sure it was Ofcom rules, and not Bs's own rules?

We don't, but Lucky is not the only babe who seems to have got this impression at BS: https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2410118