Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

(24-02-2020 21:41 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(24-02-2020 14:27 )winsaw Wrote:  there are 11 girls on the schedule for tonight, surely thats way to many,

9, not 11. But yeah, probably still too many, assuming they all turn up.

Was deffenalty 11 on the schedule for last night but you hit nail on the head most didn't turn up again, maybe that's the idea advertising all the flaky girls on one night and being happy if 4 actually make it into the studio lol, what a way to run a business

(25-02-2020 13:29 )winsaw Wrote:  

(24-02-2020 21:41 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(24-02-2020 14:27 )winsaw Wrote:  there are 11 girls on the schedule for tonight, surely thats way to many,

9, not 11. But yeah, probably still too many, assuming they all turn up.

Was deffenalty 11 on the schedule for last night but you hit nail on the head most didn't turn up again, maybe that's the idea advertising all the flaky girls on one night and being happy if 4 actually make it into the studio lol, what a way to run a business

There was 9 when I looked, and they don't usually bother amending it once it's posted.

^ They don't bother amending it once it's agreed weeks before. They know now what shifts have been allocated (and agreed by girls) for March but we can guarantee that come March 1st it will be inaccurate. I don't know why people get bent out of shape by it when we all know it can't be relied upon

I'm struggling to find any positives from last night on TV apart from the odd sight of Chloe it was definitely Monday blues

(25-02-2020 16:05 )Geriisgreat Wrote:  I'm struggling to find any positives from last night on TV apart from the odd sight of Chloe it was definitely Monday blues

it was terrible again m8,they seem to have slumped into a stuper ,i havent seen anything half decent for a while now on b/s ,its just boring

Definitely shankey I really baffled why they keep having the likes of priya and lynda when they do f all whilst I can see a bit of promise in Chloe

(25-02-2020 13:59 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ They don't bother amending it once it's agreed weeks before. They know now what shifts have been allocated (and agreed by girls) for March but we can guarantee that come March 1st it will be inaccurate. I don't know why people get bent out of shape by it when we all know it can't be relied upon

I take it they don't still fine the babes for a no-show?

It's probably not such an issue these days, with only 2 channels and a studio full of web girls to fall back on.

(25-02-2020 21:15 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(25-02-2020 13:59 )SecretAgent Wrote:  ^ They don't bother amending it once it's agreed weeks before. They know now what shifts have been allocated (and agreed by girls) for March but we can guarantee that come March 1st it will be inaccurate. I don't know why people get bent out of shape by it when we all know it can't be relied upon

I take it they don't still fine the babes for a no-show?

It's probably not such an issue these days, with only 2 channels and a studio full of web girls to fall back on.

they dont ammend it because its another ploy,con call it what you want to tempt punters into thinking a favorite or hot performers on and seeing she isnt will waste credits any way ,i fell for it a week or so back,sophie advertised on the web mr p ,no show ended up wasting money on a load of crap, no fool like an old fool i know, but the one thing b/s is good at is ripping you off,just waiting for their next venture being as its so quiet

It won’t be a surprise that I’m only really interested when Danni Levy is appearing on Daytime and I get a personal update from her about when she’s appearing. I know other girls do let their regular callers know what their schedule is. It’s much more reliable than the BS website/Twitter

Another poor night's viewing, the other channels are better and I expect sooner or later one of the Web girls will be called into service.