Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(08-03-2020 17:31 )ShandyHand Wrote:  ^^ Tbf she doesn't try to say other babes shouldn't do them fta (she seems to imply she thinks that should be for night babes only if anything) but that it's not for her and she doesn't see what's in it for the day babe.

I agree watcher there is a 'point' however: A larger audience is gained by the fta goal which the babe, if she's any good, can then manipulate into further spending. Sure fta is not for puss level content (not for day babes at least) but a teasy smaller goal or two done fta can spur guys on to the stream and stir their loins to just the right degree. (Mainstream linear TV utilises an idea called hammocking for new shows in particular. You put your offering between two established crowd pleasing shows and it keeps viewers pinned to your channel - on commercial TV, while you try to sell them things of course - between the two big draws.)

As every babe is bound to have different levels and priorities as to how they work there should be many clearly defined options for ways of working to my mind. Clarity and transparency to the customer is key to their trust in their purchases though - as ever.

I concur too, that head and shoulders is a very poor thing to resort to as a selling technique and that it springs from the same kind of prioritising of anti-freeloader thinking - even if it ends up costing them their audience it seems.

There definitely needs to be a level of clarity and transparency

(08-03-2020 17:30 )Stemmw Wrote:  

(08-03-2020 17:28 )babelover48 Wrote:  Wow they have lost their second best ever presenter - is it for good?

Don't know if you were following her twitter yesterday but they've been taking shifts off her, giving them to other presenters, moving her onto other days all without telling her. Very disrespectful to her.

It seems like she might have a case for unreasonable behaviour and possibly any missing wages.

(08-03-2020 17:28 )babelover48 Wrote:  Wow they have lost their second best ever presenter - is it for good?

Oh, has someone else gone too?

Lola

Jenny comments are interesting and I think show more the mindset of 66 always trying to find a way to put things behind a paywall,
I have no issues with her not wanting to show pussy that's her choice, but it's disappointing that she seams to not understand that when done well by girls happy to be at that level as some do on bs they can make both the girls and channel very good money, it just shows how deep the anti free mindset is at 66 and how they just don't seam to get that today's viewer is tomorrow tipper or caller, the shows have changed but they seem to not want to go with thing but instead try to change things to the way they want them, this Jenny is the reason 66 lost a channel you as a company don't listen to what those who pay the money that keeps u going want,

This from Anna’s stream earlier and Jenny currently hiding behind a chair (stealing Chloe Aylings move ) is what baffles me most why bother streaming that when they should be CAM only.

If it's Cam, ie Webcam as opposed to Web Only then the graphic should be shown:



Trying to do half and half just looks peculiar.

It's time someone pressed the detonator on s66. maybe it should happen like this :-

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=dav...A35F86E2E1

(08-03-2020 17:30 )Stemmw Wrote:  

(08-03-2020 17:28 )babelover48 Wrote:  Wow they have lost their second best ever presenter - is it for good?

Don't know if you were following her twitter yesterday but they've been taking shifts off her, giving them to other presenters, moving her onto other days all without telling her. Very disrespectful to her.

Agree very disrespectful to Lola, don’t blame her for leaving whatsoever & fully agree with winsaw, s66 aren’t getting that today’s viewer is tomorrow’s caller & tipper. If they keep this up people will stop calling etc.

It’s just like with the lads mags. People will go why do I need to pay when I can get the same content elsewhere for free. (Yes there was the anti lads mags campaign, but I think the internet ultimately killed off the lads mags) if s66 keep this up, it’s RIP S66 & it’s entirely their own fault

(08-03-2020 18:39 )winsaw Wrote:  Jenny comments are interesting and I think show more the mindset of 66 always trying to find a way to put things behind a paywall,
I have no issues with her not wanting to show pussy that's her choice, but it's disappointing that she seams to not understand that when done well by girls happy to be at that level as some do on bs they can make both the girls and channel very good money, it just shows how deep the anti free mindset is at 66 and how they just don't seam to get that today's viewer is tomorrow tipper or caller, the shows have changed but they seem to not want to go with thing but instead try to change things to the way they want them, this Jenny is the reason 66 lost a channel you as a company don't listen to what those who pay the money that keeps u going want,

Couldn't agree more, the goal of any sales enterprise is to turn the casual browser into a paying customer, this is something that seems to go over the heads of those at s66. you cant entice the casual viewer into parting with their money if you don't provide any stimulus to do so. The same girls who will hide form the main feed for half their shifts will comment on twitter that no one calls anymore. the babe channels fundamental appeal for callers has always been that they can see the babe they are picking up the phone to call, if all that's on screen is a foot or half of someones head then there is NO incentive to pick up the phone and call.