(27-12-2018 12:26 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:
A BRIT model who spent £40,000 on boob jobs took her 34NN bust for an eye-popping night out on Boxing Day.
Nicki Valentina Rose, 26, was seen in the swanky Spinningfields area of Manchester last night after spending a staggering £68,000 on plastic surgery.
The glamour model, who has to sleep on her chest to feel comfortable, wore a skin-tight shocking pink dress and matching heels on heels.
Doctors have previously warned Nicki that her health is at risk — including back pain and chronic tiredness —but she is ignoring advice and wants an enormous 5,000cc (cubic centimetre) breast implant volume.
In many threads, to which I've contributed, at least, I think I'm in a minority (of one!?). In being attracted to trans women.
I'm not going to repeat, all that I said, in a 'Natural Girls' thread, couple days ago:
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2484695
However, as I've said in other threads, much earlier, I do have strong disagreements, with identity politics. Both around black identity, being black, myself, and around gender.
Indeed, whilst NVR doesn't often, directly label herself. It's not a 'secret', that she's trans, and that she still has her bone-us. About which, I'm not aware of her having any plans, to have it removed.
So it's possibly due to the expected, but contorted etiquette, re: trans ID politics, that her being trans, is omitted, among many news stories' featuring her. Not that I'm saying, that it's always pertinent, necessarily.
There are actually some newspapers, and maybe other news outlets, who have trans activists' "advising" them, on how they write about trans people.
A remarkable editorial intervention, that in times past, would have been reserved, for relatively exceptional constituencies, such as security services.
Although today, I expect 'black lives matter', is in a similar position. Despite many aspects, of its politics' being as contentious, divisive, and plain wacky, as some 'counter-cultural'/'radical' political groups, from the 1960s and '70s, who wouldn't have been welcomed in as many elite circles.
As someone who's been a Marxist, his whole adult life, I can say that blm aren't remotely Marxist. Plus, it's not only 'conservative' people, with a small c, who disagree with them, black and white.
NVR's being Asian, is another aspect of her back-story, that is omitted. Same qualification of pertinence, as above.
NVR would be the second trans woman, with a bone-us, to appear on these channels.
The first was on RLC, several years ago. I won't name her, but she has been featured on this website.
She is something of a character, and her legal troubles, has made her a recurrent subject of attention, for gender-critical feminists.
Her legal troubles exceed, even those of Sophie Dalzell, a bio-woman friend of NVR, often papped together.
A younger trans woman, Kairah Kelly, is someone else, with whom, NVR has been papped together. Like NVR, Kelly has got rather carried away, ultimately, with her body modifications, alas. Albeit, still retaining her bone-us, for now, at least.
My preference for trans women, with a bone-us, is the sort of thing that would get me into trouble, with some zealous, trans activists. But it would be worse, still, if I used the phrase, 'male genitalia'!
Indeed, like other identity bureaucrats, they're hostile to anyone, who resists confining people to pigeonholes, by approaching them as individuals.
Somewhere else on the web, where I'm more generally political, I clashed, earlier this year, with someone who might be known by the blog, he produced, about babe channels, for several years.
Although, for reasons I didn't quite fathom, he removed the blog completely, the BS blog, recently reproduced, one of his posts.
I disagreed with him, about a number of things, over the several years, we were in contact. But nothing like the argument, we had about trans ID politics.
He'd posted a blog piece, criticising gender-critical feminists. That was full of, sweeping statements, without a single reference, for any of his claims.
To which I responded, with a sober, reasoned, nuanced argument, for which I could provide references, for all my points. But his response, was just an angry attack about my "spin", and trying to undermine my credibility, by my relatively slight association, with someone else, he objected to.
There were several years, between the trans woman on RLC, and a trans woman appearing on 66.
I am sympathetic, to many of the criticisms, of the politics around the latter's appearances, on this page:
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2256643
But the fact that, having appeared on the website, of one of the babe channels, when she still had her bone-us, that she didn't appear on a British-based tv channel, till she no longer had it, suggests that, negotiating dealing with trans women's genitalia, is still more fraught, than dealing with bio-women's, on these channels.
However, the trans woman on RLC, is far from the only precedent:
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2447999
I hope people don't feel that I've 'hijacked', this dormant thread. Although I'm sure that some will resent, my reactivating this topic.
However, I must say, not least, because of the genital conundrum, that I'm probably more bothered, still, by the ostensibly, less fraught matter, of why there aren't more black women on the channels:
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2430022
Just to close, with a couple names on my wishlist; anyone who's seen Darcy Buchan, an Australian fashion model, will know why I'd want to see her, on one of these channels. Another is Selly Madelline, a Latin American woman, who used to appear, regularly, on Chaturbate. She's similarly, naturally large-busted.
As I've tweeted, I was recently blocked by Buchan, when I made a follow request, to her Instagram account, which is obviously private, anyway!
Another name, which I've mentioned on another thread, and who must be on my wishlist, is Iryna Ivanova:
https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2461274