Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

Following on, from post #26840 https://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p...pid2458970

Quoting from those aforementioned screenshots, of XP forum posts, from 2014 and 2015:

There's a lot of reflective glare from the white backdrop, so perhaps a softer-coloured backdrop would make a noticeable difference?

I hope no-one blames me, if it's a change of lighting, that led the ladies tonight, to look like they'd been Tango'd, or been drinking too much Sunny Delight.
I suggested, that the lighting be toned down, softened, or dimmed, not changing the colour of the lights.

It's been good to see some darker colours on set, recently.
Some more shade, against the light, would be welcome. But not extreme contrasts.
A softer backdrop would make a lot of difference. Anything that means you can see the ladies better, can only be good.
The snowblinding effect doesn't seem to be a wider problem with Freeview. It's not much different online. Whilst elsewhere on Freeview, lighting ranges from moderate to excessive, adjusted frequently.

There are a lot of obtrusive colour schemes around: really bright, glaring colours, often over-contrasted with black mats; and other extreme contrasts of colours; a 'sauna' set (without water or steam!), that is so similar to the skin tones of some of the women who appear on it, that they're virtually camouflaged; and other camouflage colour schemes. Sometimes, the ladies' outfits camouflage them. Also, there is over-lighting, or under-lighting, or gratuitously coloured lighting.
Over-elaborate, busy sets, seem to be a competitive sport, in some quarters. Apparently aiming to look like adverts in 'upmarket' magazines.
There are obviously viewers/callers who like, poolroom sets, lounge sets, with or without piano, office sets, back alley sets, aeroplane sets, barn sets, park bench set, etc.
But I think that xxXpanded, at least, has the virtue of simplicity, with the ladies' being the focus of attention.

... Although, when someone as profoundly beautiful, as Aruba Jasmine, appears on my Freeview tv, as she did for the first time, on the night of the above posting, I don't mind other channels' set designs. So long as they don't crop her face out of shot, and her voice isn't out of synch with the picture.

For those who like to see women walking around, there is some of that, but the fondness for sets with, desks and tables, and the intermittently dizzying camerawork, means you don't see their legs, or faces, as much as one might want.
Hence, my preference for seeing a solo lady, lying on a chaise longue.
If it's someone you really like, then you have to try to see passed all that. And at least, they're most often, on their own.


The two-line spacing above, separates different posts.
Some parts, applied more generally, than others. Still more, applies to extant channels.
But I hope enough is pertinent, for this post to not be exiled to the Twilight Zone! I'll move it to a more general thread, if necessary.

I thought I might have said, something about black absorbing light, and therefore being best avoided, in sets' colour schemes. Not least, when a black-haired, darker-skinned woman, is to appear on set.
There are still a lot of instances, where there are dark colours on sets, with blinding light, shone onto them.

There are other posts, or parts thereof, that I might quote elsewhere, at another time.
Although, I don't think I have a screenshot, of my posts' saying, that three women on a set, looks like a call centre!

I'll end with this:

Posted 19 August 2015 - 04:15AM
On Playboy TV Daytime, shortly before, the 6AM end of transmission, on Freeview, yesterday, Alicia spoke on-air!

For those who saw Alicia, when she was on Elite/66, that might be no big deal. But that was during a time, when Elite/66 wasn't on fv. Hence, she was on fv, only on XP.


I did type that, and posted it, originally, nearer the time of the post, it followed up, back in June. But I withdrew it, to re-edit, and then, half-forgot about it. Whilst I wasn't on the forum, very much, for several weeks, anyway.

I could probably add a number of further points.
But for the moment, I will say, that I'm not, too much keener, on 66's new sets.
The busy graffiti on the walls, is a definite minus. Although, the colour schemes have moved away, from extremes of bright and dark.
Above, I'd said that a chaise longue, would be best, for the models to be on. I'm less sure of that, now. The armchairs from a three-piece suite, might be better. Certainly, more than a two, or three-seater sofa. Where a presenter can spend most of the time, lying sidelong to the camera. Rather than sat, facing the camera.
On colour schemes, a partly good model, is the minimal schemes in many porn scenes. Usually someone's home, possibly rented out to porn producers.
Only, partly good, as they're often like a snow blizzard; white walls, and furniture, with added, excessive lighting! Sometimes, in addition to sunlight, coming in through a nearby window, or even in shot, with evidently inadequate, if any, attempts to control or reduce, light or glare.
Sunlight is not an evident issue, with the setups of 66 etc. But, over-lighting is. Sometimes, changing considerably, the apparent skin tone, of those on camera. Such as making some look paler. Or darker, if a coloured light, or filter, is used.
I'm darker-skinned, myself, and I do have preferences, for women, across the spectrum of skin tones.
Back on XP forum, I did remark, that fake tan, 'ersatzuma', was possibly the only 'fakery'/body modification, that was a general turn-off for me.
I lamented, how few, pale-toned women, there were, on XP, or elsewhere. Periods of sunshine, don't necessarily, make much difference.
But generally, on these channels, and in porn, there are probably more, 'mid-toned' women, than either pale or dark.

All the women that work for this channel must be seriously doubling down on doing nothing but staying & sitting at tables the whole nightshit.

Seeing as an other table set has been added & you have Maxie & Rooxy tonight doing a whole lot of nothing.

I wished that I'd seen this tweet before spending 2 hours waiting for her to appear on TV, and then giving up on her appearing just before midnight.



There was 2 hours of Elle in her leather outfit and flyswatter. I'm not a dom fan, so that's 2 hours that I'll never get back

Thought Nikita had a good debut on nights, hope she does more

Blimey, s66 have 2 babes sharing a set right now. hope this continues after tonight which I presume is to promote the 241 special webshow

(24-08-2020 00:22 )Taon777 Wrote:  All the women that work for this channel must be seriously doubling down on doing nothing but staying & sitting at tables the whole nightshit.

Seeing as an other table set has been added & you have Maxie & Rooxy tonight doing a whole lot of nothing.

A toilet set might be more appropriate for that sort of activity?!!

Jada is called dirty Jada yet shes the tame one whilst Fernanda Ferrari is the dirty performer.

Jada is well and truly more seductive than Fern if she turns it on. But Fernanda must keeps giving.

Jada used to be dirty.
Yet shes still my favourite, maybe for sentimental value.

Jada remarked live on the mic recently that it'll be a better show if we get involved.
I didn't think that she was trying to drum up business per se and I still think it's a reasonable point. The girls shouldn't be showing it all if no ones tipping or ringing. I think no one waggles the phone more aggressively than Jada (other than Lori) and I regret that a top performer like her, veteran of two stations should have to.

Once again she's up against the steam roller that is Fernanda

S66 had better bloody look out because this evening I discovered that Babestation have a published schedule on their website.
This gives an idea of what information you can pull off it

It's nowhere near as user friendly as S66's but it exists and I couldn't agree more with fucu2 assessment that it's a recent and welcome addition.

Is Anna on at all?