Babestation - Leaderboard

This is has little bearing on how good a babe is, in terms of what is delivered for these tips. If you can even believe that is is remotely accurate, just a brief look a the top 10 & bar 2 they rest are predominately Nightshow babes. Interesting to see Tanya Renai, who's levels are tame to say the least, are her fans blindly throwing money at her in the hope that she'll show more ? Nothing to do with value for money, & more to do with how stupid some of the babes fan are are for parting with cash. The phrase "more money than sense springs to mind.

(28-01-2021 15:19 )Davesmithy Wrote:  Where is Hannah Claydon?

Hannah doesn't use a VibeToy or do Tip Goals. Alexandra doesn't either.

So you'll never see them on the leaderboard, because it doesn't show us the money they make from calls and cams.

last weeks top 3

1) Priya = £ 2634
2) Jess West = £ 2493
3) Beth = £ 1994

Jess and Beth do some of the very best tip shows so happy to see them there

I'd be really cautious about jumping to conclusions that the leaderboard is a measure or how well/poorly a girl is doing. If BS wanted us to know that then they'd publish a league table of all the earnings they make from a girl! I'm pretty sure their purpose is to derive sales not as a performance management tool!

I only bother with daytime and at the times girls are on the show BS earnings will be derived from direct calls, pervcam, vibratoy buzzers, tips, Streamate shows and tips and income through other live collaborations.

Not all girls use all available channels as is obvious from watching

^^
"cautious"

The girls only get a percentage of the tips they make. Something like 50% for a studio show and 30% for a home show, or maybe the other way around.

(28-01-2021 14:58 )winsaw Wrote:  1) Priya = £ 2202
2) Alice = £ 1356
...
36) Zara Lei = £ 78

No wonder the world's the way it is

(28-01-2021 22:03 )Doddle Wrote:  

(28-01-2021 14:58 )winsaw Wrote:  1) Priya = £ 2202
2) Alice = £ 1356
...
36) Zara Lei = £ 78

No wonder the world's the way it is

There's no accounting for taste. Or the lack of it, to be more accurate

(28-01-2021 15:43 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  This is has little bearing on how good a babe is, in terms of what is delivered for these tips. If you can even believe that is is remotely accurate, just a brief look a the top 10 & bar 2 they rest are predominately Nightshow babes. Interesting to see Tanya Renai, who's levels are tame to say the least, are her fans blindly throwing money at her in the hope that she'll show more ? Nothing to do with value for money, & more to do with how stupid some of the babes fan are are for parting with cash. The phrase "more money than sense springs to mind.

While personally I agree some punters spend stupidly, it's all implied by your first sentence: How good a babe is is subjective.

We can dig deeper too...

What a tip goal fulfilment should look like, and what tips should be for, or do, has been deliberately left ill-defined. That lack of definition lets each punter make his own mind up whether he's satisfied by a babe's actions resultant from the tips. There is, sadly, no real definite standard to be fulfilled. Babes therefore only really get judged against their own standards.

And while the reasons why punters spend are roughly predictable and similar from punter to punter (broadly, our knowledge tells us we should be happy with what we'll get) what it is we are looking for is another story. What will make us happy, what we want, when we spend... well there are massive variances in this, as we've all witnessed. Basically, babeland is a bloody broadchurch for something that appears, and in some ways is, so simple.

The result of all these vaguries, not least in punter expectation, can leave the commentator scratching his head at why some babes are successful. What one punter is perfectly happy with the next will think he's an idiot for accepting. Is either guy really wrong though?

Shrug, move on, spend on those that do it for you, promote the things to your taste and ignore these pointless, manipulative, and insultingly pitched, leaderboards. They are worthless tat.

(28-01-2021 22:08 )Tumble_Drier Wrote:  There's no accounting for taste. Or the lack of it, to be more accurate

More like a taste for accounting