scooby_doo
Senior Poster
Posts: 427
Joined: Dec 2020
Reputation: 10
|
RE: OnlyFans
(06-02-2021 18:21 )Goodfella3041 Wrote: (06-02-2021 18:04 )scooby_doo Wrote: ...there's a growing trend certainly amongst the Babe station girls to let them get involved with their page. Often there's a good chance its not the model replying to DM's...
I asked a BS girl if she had a OnlyFans and she said no. She said she’d only do one if and when she’d have the time to run it herself and that “most” of the girls had someone else running their pages for them.
I’ve also had experience of DM “mishaps” where the person responding thought she was corresponding with the model, but accidentally sent the message to me (i.e. “...I told him you’d get back to him...”, etc.). That kinda gave the game away.
I've been stung by this... the problem is it gives the channel girls who do there own pages a bad name, and there are a few of them, Atlanta and Mia M to name two.
Maybe the channel and also the girls should look at Clause 3.7 of the Onlyfans Terms - (basically a personal account you don't allow anyone else access). You can have your account suspended / terminated for this as your legally responsible for it and what's posted. Here's the full text :-
"You are fully responsible for any and all activities that occur on your account and you are responsible for keeping your login details confidential and secure. You agree not to disclose these details to any other person or entity and immediately notify FIL at support@OnlyFans.com if you believe someone has used or is using your account without your permission or if your account has been subject to any other breach of security. You also agree to ensure that you log out of your account at the end of each session. You should use particular caution when accessing your account from a public or shared computer so that others are not able to access, view or record your password or other personal information. "
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2021 18:32 by scooby_doo.)
|
|
06-02-2021 18:30 |
|
punjab33
Apprentice Poster
Posts: 16
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 4
|
RE: OnlyFans
I think there are still a lot of girls doing their own pages. We mustn't tar everyone with the same brush.
|
|
07-02-2021 01:35 |
|
Goodfella3041
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,683
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 61
|
RE: OnlyFans
Another tell-tale sign... After being repeatedly stalled over a pre-paid purchase, I wrote a really stroppy DM. I initially got a stroppy reply back. Then some time passed and the tone changed and I suddenly got an apology and offers of compensation.
My best guess is that the model herself had a look through all the messages and realised that whoever was responding on her behalf really did drop the ball.
It’s good, I guess, that in the end I didn’t get ripped off. But it really does reduce OF ‘interaction’ to the same kind of customer service relationship that I have with BT and Sky. Lousy service until you complain and threaten to leave, and then the ‘manager’ gives you a deal.
(06-02-2021 18:30 )scooby_doo Wrote: ... the problem is it gives the channel girls who do there own pages a bad name, and there are a few of them ...
Too true.
I would really love to see one of those girls who routinely sounds off on Twitter about ‘time wasters’ issue an equally scathing indictment of ‘creators’ who rip off their customers. The fact that we go into it with so much mistrust and cynicism can’t be good for anyone’s business. Every time a punter gets ripped off or mistreated — and it happens A LOT — the business gets a little more difficult for every other model.
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2021 14:08 by Goodfella3041.)
|
|
07-02-2021 14:00 |
|