Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(02-05-2021 17:33 )FEDEDANELLA88 Wrote:  But if you look at the s66 roster many girls have been to babestation before: Darelle, Electra, Ella Jolie, Jada, Tori Lee, Sophia Reade, Sophie Parker, Roxxy Clark, Jasmine J, Kitty King etc. etc. They wouldn't stay on s66 if it wasn't a good channel. The truth is always in the middle in my opinion.

Agree, plus when you talk generally about the babeshows to people & when the shows are mentioned on mainstream tv, they pretty much always say “Babestation” not s66 or any other babeshow, so babes always want to go to babestation & use s66 as a stepping stone to eventually join BS

For me it is impossible to say which channel is better depends on the tastes. Furthermore, each model must be considered individually. For example Alexia Lee goes to bs because she has the closest studios to home, Mikki B went to bs because she wanted to try something different. Many girls tell you that BS doesn't have that sense of family that s66 has, but they are more organized with shifts. Each channel has its pros and cons.

(02-05-2021 18:21 )FEDEDANELLA88 Wrote:  For me it is impossible to say which channel is better depends on the tastes. Furthermore, each model must be considered individually. For example Alexia Lee goes to bs because she has the closest studios to home, Mikki B went to bs because she wanted to try something different. Many girls tell you that BS doesn't have that sense of family that s66 has, but they are more organized with shifts. Each channel has its pros and cons.

I think you can objectively reach a firm conclusion as to which channel is better - or at least you could before they all joined the race to the bottom with nothing but gimmicks to differentiate them from the 'competition'. it comes down to how 'fresh' they can keep the channel, can they continue to evolve their brand and its' output?? Is the roster such that it can be seen through the 'unique' nature of the personalities that appear, rather than repeat after repeat etc, is the output 'themes' etc - capable of achieving enough variety etc. Sets?? now there is a theme - are they 'interesting and do they allow the girls to present different scenarios narratives??

I guess some of the ideas above do themselves come down to personal taste, but they also give an indication of how capable those that run these channels are of being creative.

As it stands, they all rely on punters wanting nothing more than t & a, and if that means the same night after night etc, then so be it! They don't therefore, have to think beyond that!!

So you guys don't think that the girls are leaving because of the poor technology that studio66 is using? The bad quality streams from home, resulting in fewer calls and revenue?

(02-05-2021 20:10 )Babefan2021 Wrote:  So you guys don't think that the girls are leaving because of the poor technology that studio66 is using? The bad quality streams from home, resulting in fewer calls and revenue?

It may well be a factor - yes!!

At s66 there has always been a higher turnover than babestation. The S66 obviously has flaws and the latest updates have not been positive. However, I think s66 and Expanded deserve more credit. You have not been online for more than 10 years if you are a dying channel as many say. When in 2018 there was the problem with the earnings of onlyfans, many people wrote that s66 would fail after a short time. After 3 years it doesn't seem to me that s66 is on the way to closure. 4-5 girls have left x bs these days, but s66 has already replaced them.

Does Bs have only merits? The new ones are at the levels of Leigh Darby, lexi Love, Danni Harwood, Geri, Tommie Jo. etc???
It is always a question of point of view. Obviously not even s66 is remotely comparable to the days of Elite TV.
The only certain fact is that Bs, S66 and Expanded all have excellent rosters. In my opinion we should wish for healthy competition, not the failure of channels we don't like.
Good evening to all friends of the forum.

(02-05-2021 17:05 )The Goatman Wrote:  I think they just need a better cameraman

And tech support

(02-05-2021 20:56 )FEDEDANELLA88 Wrote:  You have not been online for more than 10 years

Yes you're right, many channels have been and gone in the time that this channel has been around. It's survived when most others haven't.

The observation that 66 survive well beyond many predictions of their demise is not a new one. Primarily this anomaly came about because the guys making said predictions overestimated the importance of what they were judging 66 on to its prospects for remaining in business.

Survival as a business is not particularly indicative of quality of output or service. It is indicative of a certain tenacity, business savvy and flexibility at the right times. It is indicative that the operator knows how to cut their cloth to remain sensibly profitable.

It is also not indicative, by itself, of popularity. In theory a business can sell to just two or three clients/organisations only, say, and stay in business quite happily... as long as they do it profitably.

Both quality of output and strength in customer service have been there at times at 66, most evidently in certain eras and with certain babes, they are still there to some extent and likely always will be given the make up of the people the work there (variable enough to stay fresh and, well, variable). These factors have some impact on the profitability required to stay alive but, in this industry of limited competition and hardy user-base, only so much. (Other factors are of equal or more importance.)

It's inevitable it'll be forever to the forefront of debate on here, where and with whom those two central strengths can be found; but we have to be realistic about the limits of what we're focusing on. And we certainly have to admit that the channels that have gone bust in years gone by have not done so because of sets or rosters or anything like that. (Nor are these the things that babes give as the reasons for switching between operators note.) They went west because of various forms of mismanagement. Having the right guiding hands and principles of old, still around no matter any other changes that come about, are a clear primary importance...

Where 66 (and too as lesser extent XP) do fall down IMO is in a desire to grow. When two babes in a 241 are perfectly content to display to just 4 guys in pervcam for a few minutes when they are in direct competition with the likes of CB and MFC where multiple guys can be tipping hundreds of pounds each in the same time frame, there is some problem of scope going on. Maybe of ambition too. 

BS are certainly better at encompassing new visions for the shows; they've pulled off more variable examples in recent times. They have the resources to do so presumably. The management there have grasped the nettle of where their general output is headed - even if certain babes think they can get by on the same old tactics. The latter is a bigger problem at the more 'cautious' 66. Their reluctant babes can hold back the tide for now but for how much longer? Flexibility of approach is a constant requirement once regulatory intervention is no longer dampening things down as Ofcom did for years in this industry. 

The need to compete is back and arguably it's stronger than ever. And punters, like any consumers, certainly need that to be so because it's the biggest driver of standards going.