Elite TV / Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion

(08-11-2021 20:41 )davyboysmith Wrote:  Can read the full adjudication here with dates and times

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/p...l-2021.pdf

Those are more than just slip-ups, especially on daytime, and it's hard to believe the girls are really that stupid.

Looks more like a production issue where it's not always clear to the girls whether they're on tv or the web.

(08-11-2021 20:41 )davyboysmith Wrote:  Can read the full adjudication here with dates and times

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/p...l-2021.pdf

Not a bad first attempt at erotic fiction, great dialogue passages, if a little crude at times. Think they need to have a rethink about the title - Ofcom Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin is a little too coy and will hamper sales.

(09-11-2021 07:58 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  

(08-11-2021 20:41 )davyboysmith Wrote:  Can read the full adjudication here with dates and times

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/p...l-2021.pdf

Those are more than just slip-ups, especially on daytime, and it's hard to believe the girls are really that stupid.

Looks more like a production issue where it's not always clear to the girls whether they're on tv or the web.

Last weekend, when Jennifer Kelly was doing her epic stint, at one point she sighed that they were putting her on TV (which she doesn’t like to do these days). She pulled her knickers on, and there she was on TV. Quite quickly, though, she got a call from an obviously excited gent, and started tinkering with her gusset. I was fairly surprised when she pulled off her panties, opened her legs and started playing. I was watching on the web, but had no reason to believe this wasn’t going out on TV. Later, Jen apologised and said that they’d had to take her off TV, but now she was back.

My point is that this toggling between web and TV is invisible to web viewers, and I wonder how clear the demarcation is to the girls. Also, when was the switch flipped by the producers? Did they see Jen was going too far, and pull the plug after she’d broken the rules, or did they give her fair warning and then let her off the leash? I reckon this lack of clarity is what’s resulted in these breaches.

(08-11-2021 20:07 )dave34 Wrote:  looks like S66 has got on the wrong side of ofcom again

I'm guessing this will mean the end of S66 as a TV channel.

I completely agree with S66 assertion to Ofcom, that there should be parental responsibility for what children see - in fact primarily parental responsibility -and that the 'tools' were available to them to block or censor. Why should it always be the responsibility of this - or any - broadcaster to do a parents job for them - seemingly all the time now.

Seems more and more want to be parents without carrying the burden of responsibility for taking care of their children's welfare in what ever guise that is!! Ok, the language that was heard, should not have been but equally, it was after the watershed, so we come back to parents doing their job for once!! I sometimes wonder if the wrong people are being chaperoned in this society - seem it needs to be the 'adults' (some at least). If I am right, the presenter in question is not a surprise, as I recall seeing the instances this judgment may be related too, and thinking 'holy crap.....really??'

(09-11-2021 11:42 )Scots Napoleon Wrote:  

(08-11-2021 20:07 )dave34 Wrote:  looks like S66 has got on the wrong side of ofcom again

I'm guessing this will mean the end of S66 as a TV channel.

That would be a knee jerk reaction (I recognise - not the first complaint) At least S66 didn't use the naive 'zero mileage' argument in defence of their position, that Babestar did back in the day! Different set of circumstances then however!

^ All but one of the recorded incidents was before the watershed - one of them at 10:48 AM! I do understand why Ofcom have to be strict on this. It’s the easiest thing in the world to be flipping up and down the channels and find yourself in the sexchat zone. “No pussy or swearing FTA” does seem to fall into the “You had one job” category, and S66 blew it.

(09-11-2021 12:36 )BlastedKeith Wrote:  ^ All but one of the recorded incidents was before the watershed - one of them at 10:48 AM! I do understand why Ofcom have to be strict on this. It’s the easiest thing in the world to be flipping up and down the channels and find yourself in the sexchat zone. “No pussy or swearing FTA” does seem to fall into the “You had one job” category, and S66 blew it.

Fair Points all there! I get the strictness given these circumstances - believe me - I still say though, that parents need to perform their role too!! I have blocked these channels in the past just in case nephews/niece were around (doesn't matter any more). Why can't parents do the same

(08-11-2021 20:41 )davyboysmith Wrote:  Can read the full adjudication here with dates and times

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/p...l-2021.pdf

To whom it may concern,

Where is the regulator protecting children online from reading such complete filth as this (see attached screenshot), that's what I want to know. Not even as if it's a user upload is it! Ofcom is clearly an adult content publisher now, and should be held accountable for putting such extreme descriptions where any vulnerable eyes can stumble across them; no matter the time of the day or night. Oh who will protect us from this all pervasive harm?! I'll be writing to my MP ... or that nice women at John Lewis. She clearly saw the writing on the wall for this once venerable institution.

Yours,
A concerned citizen

P.S. Please excuse the crayon, they don't allow us anything sharp in here.

(09-11-2021 12:36 )BlastedKeith Wrote:  ^ All but one of the recorded incidents was before the watershed - one of them at 10:48 AM! I do understand why Ofcom have to be strict on this. It’s the easiest thing in the world to be flipping up and down the channels and find yourself in the sexchat zone. “No pussy or swearing FTA” does seem to fall into the “You had one job” category, and S66 blew it.

People can go on about Parental Responsibility as much as they like but if you cross the line pre-watershed you're going to get your arse kicked and deservedly so.

It looks like someone has been watching them very closely and with the amount of people "Working from home" they should have seen this coming.