HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread

Next year we might get asked to pick our 6 nominees from 3 separate categories.

• Pioneers (Pick two babes that worked between 2002-2009)
  

• Legends (Pick two babes that worked between 2010-2017)
  

• Daytime (Pick two babes that worked between 2002-2017)
  

The top 8 that get nominated in those 3 categories would then get seeded in 3 separate groups.

That might be the best format for pioneers like Dionne Mendez, legends like Fernanda Ferrari and daytime icons like Amber James to get inducted into the HOF.

(21-12-2021 23:51 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote:  Lasting impression, you've nailed it.
I decent analogy would be the Sex Pistols, 2 & a half years, one album. Undeniably made a lasting impression, voted into the Rock and Roll hall Of Fame, but refused to attend the ceremony, calling the museum "a piss stain".

I dig that. On that basis, I think I should have nominated Kerrie Lee. In my reckoning, she's been the equivalent of the Sex Pistols on the adult channels, with a kind of anarchic spirit (in fact a sex pistol is a good way to describe her). I'll nominate her next year.

(21-12-2021 23:46 )ryuken Wrote:  This year's new HOF seeded group format probably works something like this.

If it worked the way you describe then Charlemagne got all the seedings wrong, because seed #1 should play seed #6 and not seed #4 as shown in your example. Incidentally, the Rear of the Year competition you described 2 pages back also had incorrect seeding, because in the round of 32 there you had seed #1 drawn with seed #25 when it should have been seed #32.

(22-12-2021 11:25 )William H Bonney Wrote:  

(21-12-2021 23:46 )ryuken Wrote:  This year's new HOF seeded group format probably works something like this.

If it worked the way you describe then Charlemagne got all the seedings wrong, because seed #1 should play seed #6 and not seed #4 as shown in your example. Incidentally, the Rear of the Year competition you described 2 pages back also had incorrect seeding, because in the round of 32 there you had seed #1 drawn with seed #25 when it should have been seed #32.

It was just a guess that Charlemagne might pick HOF seed #1 vs HOF seed #24.

Then HOF seed #2 vs HOF seed #23, and so on and so forth.

I did #1 vs #64 in the ROTY KO Round, and then #2 vs #63 etc.

In the ROTY group stage I put the #1 to #8 KO round winners in Groups A to H.

Then #9 to #16 second, #17 to #24 third and #25 to #32 fourth

So that's why the #32 KO round winner ended up in Group H, and not Group A.

As I said previously doing ROTY was too time consuming and I'd never do another one.

To clear things up, Group A contains the 1st seed and the 6th Seed.
It was more complicated because there were 24 girls.

Don't forget this thread is for enquiries regarding this years contest and for positive ideas and suggestions on how the HOF should progress next year.

This years award has now been completed.

Thank you to all the members who have nominated and voted.

The new inductees will be announced starting at 9:15pm

I sense Snooks happiness incoming

That concluded this session of the Hall of Fame.

As these awards are fluid we welcome any positive suggestions.
There have been some suggestions already which may feature the next time.

Is the Babe hall of fame on the same road as the forum members one?

If so can Ashley pop round for afternoon tea some time please?

Three worthy Hall Of Famers , i haven't been happy with any of the award winners the past two years but the Hall Of Fame seems to always get it right especially this year.