Winston Wolfe
AKA "Mr. Black"
Posts: 382
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 12
|
RE: Bang Babes on freeview
(05-11-2009 01:16 )Censorship :-( Wrote: Are BB going to compromise even more of their '$ky' output, or are they going to produce a Freeview only show for the new channel? Or, are they going to loosen up a bit, and provide a real babe channel on Freeview, as per their output on '$ky'? Seems unlikely, given the rumblings from Ofcon, in their so-called ‘consultation'.
It obviously makes sense from a business point of view to get these channels on Freeview, but I'm more a M.O.P. If it mean't compromising the quality of the service, then even for the extra revenue I probably wouldn't bother if it was my channel...
I have no problem with Freeview as long as the content is the same as Sky and doesn't interfere with any of the girls performance. All the girls should be able to express themselves as individuals freely...
I'm sure Bang Media want the content to be the same for both Sky & Freeview, but unfortunately OFCOM keep "moving the goalposts" with their ambiguous rules & regulations...
I'll sum it up for you like this...
Can you imagine an oiled up Jet Black spreading her bum cheeks to the camera on Freeview? Nah, me neither!
I'm here to help - if my help's not appreciated then lotsa luck, gentlemen.
|
|
05-11-2009 11:35 |
|
TheWatcher
Ex Moderator
Posts: 10,497
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 221
|
RE: Bang Babes on freeview
(05-11-2009 11:35 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: (05-11-2009 01:16 )Censorship :-( Wrote: Are BB going to compromise even more of their '$ky' output, or are they going to produce a Freeview only show for the new channel? Or, are they going to loosen up a bit, and provide a real babe channel on Freeview, as per their output on '$ky'? Seems unlikely, given the rumblings from Ofcon, in their so-called ‘consultation'.
It obviously makes sense from a business point of view to get these channels on Freeview, but I'm more a M.O.P. If it mean't compromising the quality of the service, then even for the extra revenue I probably wouldn't bother if it was my channel...
I have no problem with Freeview as long as the content is the same as Sky and doesn't interfere with any of the girls performance. All the girls should be able to express themselves as individuals freely...
I'm sure Bang Media want the content to be the same for both Sky & Freeview, but unfortunately OFCOM keep "moving the goalposts" with their ambiguous rules & regulations...
I'll sum it up for you like this...
Can you imagine an oiled up Jet Black spreading her bum cheeks to the camera on Freeview? Nah, me neither!
As I have posted elsewhere, The reason the freeview content is worse than the Sky content probably has more to do with pressure applied by the Sky marketing dept., than anything to do with ofcom rules.
|
|
05-11-2009 11:42 |
|
vila
Viewers' Champion
Posts: 3,588
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 51
|
RE: Bang Babes on freeview
(05-11-2009 11:34 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: the details are available for all to see.
Where?
(05-11-2009 11:35 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: It obviously makes sense from a business point of view to get these channels on Freeview, but I'm more a M.O.P.
M.O.P.?
(05-11-2009 11:35 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: Can you imagine an oiled up Jet Black spreading her bum cheeks to the camera on Freeview? Nah, me neither!
No, and she’s not allowed to do it on Sky either, at least not without adequate cover, as Ofcom have made quite clear in their latest judgement.
(05-11-2009 12:12 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: Buck stops with OFCOM, they make the rules...
Which, as has been posted many, many, many times, are EXACTLY THE SAME for all broadcasting platforms. There is ONLY ONE Broadcasting Code.
|
|
05-11-2009 17:21 |
|