Is Bang Babes the best channel right now?

I'm sure anyone who's been watching the babe channels for more than, say, a year will know that every channel goes through it's peaks and troughs and Bang Babes hit their trough not too long ago when they lost girls like Emily, Alexa, Hazel, Dionne Daniels etc. to new kids on the block Elite TV as well as losing other girls like Asia, Vikki V, Jennifer Keelings and Victoria to night show retirement. Bang Babes was at that point a channel I barely ever watched.

Now, however, they have a sensational roster of girls. A mix of experienced girls poached from other channels (Amanda, Jemma, Donna, Lilly Roma Lolly Badcock etc.), and semi-fresh faces (Toni, Cate Harrington, Charlie Monaco). They also, in my opinion, have the best sets with the best lighting. None of the poorly lit sets that sometimes hamper channels like Elite, they have nice, bright sets that show off their cracking array of talent.

Call wise, their menu could be shorter but other than that, they've really sorted out their phone lines which for me used to be an issue.

Cellcast have mixed it up a bit lately with their format which is looking good so far but the loss of so many great babes to BB and Elite has left them with a fairly weak roster. Elite are definitely up there as they too have a cracking roster but for me, Bang Babes is top dog right now.

Discuss?

Perhaps their Sky show is tops but the Freeview one is dire even worse then the BS one.

A great mix of Girls, awsome performances, great camera work and lighting, however it is let down by not using the correct aspect ratio! They really need to sort this out, it has gone on for way to long.

Filming in 16:9 ratio and broadcasting in a 4:3 format distorts the picture and alters the Girls body shape.
Bang Babes was the first channel to broadcast in 16:9, now they have taken a backwards step.

The Audio problems can be ignored but they need to correct the ratio problems.

(07-11-2009 15:27 )vostok 1 Wrote:  The Audio problems can be ignored but they need to correct the ratio problems.

Absolutely! How can they not notice this problem? And whats more,many forum members seem to do their caps like that and are not bothered? BB is still the best channel,tho standards of new girls are slipping. It used to have a certain type of classy stereotypical poledancer/pornstar, in recent months however, its letting all types in!

Don't think there is a 'best'. It depends what you're looking for.

BB certainly has its own style identity which is good and it does that thing better than BS and Elite...IF that's what works for you.

. For my taste it's a bit too 'rough and ready'. For me it's a tussle between Babestation and Elite with BB a distant 3rd.
BUT it has been interesting watching Amanda's journey across there and obviously the more variety of stations the better it is for everyone, not to mention keeping a healthy sense of competition.

It's one of the best, but the sets arent as good as they used to when you could bb2 from bb1 in the set with the sparkle lights. They use their brilliant bangbabes sign a lot less these days and what happened to the other one. I absolutely hate the set with just the white sheet. I think babes deserve to work in a comfortable and nicely decorated set rather than i shitty sheet stuck on a wall like on 40+, livexxxbabes and live960.

(07-11-2009 15:27 )vostok 1 Wrote:  A great mix of Girls, awsome performances, great camera work and lighting, however it is let down by not using the correct aspect ratio! They really need to sort this out, it has gone on for way to long.

Filming in 16:9 ratio and broadcasting in a 4:3 format distorts the picture and alters the Girls body shape.
Bang Babes was the first channel to broadcast in 16:9, now they have taken a backwards step.

The Audio problems can be ignored but they need to correct the ratio problems.

I've not noticed any aspect ratio problems at all on my freeview PVRs.
This was Jemma last night. She looks ok to me.

(07-11-2009 15:27 )vostok 1 Wrote:  A great mix of Girls, awsome performances, great camera work and lighting, however it is let down by not using the correct aspect ratio! They really need to sort this out, it has gone on for way to long.

Filming in 16:9 ratio and broadcasting in a 4:3 format distorts the picture and alters the Girls body shape.
Bang Babes was the first channel to broadcast in 16:9, now they have taken a backwards step.

The Audio problems can be ignored but they need to correct the ratio problems.

At least that's one thing they've got right on Freeview. It was wrong on the first night (but manually correctable) but since then it's been a correct 16:9 image.

Pity the content isn't to the same high standard as the picture quality.

(07-11-2009 17:24 )TheWatcher Wrote:  I've not noticed any aspect ratio problems at all on my freeview PVRs.
This was Jemma last night. She looks ok to me.

Well its good to see that they have the technical competence to broadcast in the correct aspect ratio on Freeview. And it only took them a day to correct it!

Shame about channels 901, 912, 948 and 959 on Sky though.
Although they have got both the picture and audio broadcasting correctly for the video loop showing picture messaging services over on channel 907.

If they are broadcasting 16:9 as 4:3 on satellite, it should be manually correctable; annoying, but not a major problem, I would have thought.

Unlike the content, or should that be the lack of content, on Bang Babes Freeview, which has proved a big disappointment; rarely any better than Tamestation, and some of the time, even poorer. With the prospect of a second BBF channel, there seems little indication that it won’t just be more of the same, meaning that Freeview will have six channels that aren’t worth watching, instead of five