meisterlampe1989_2.0
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,500
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
|
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Not a lot to add to jorrell.
Motivated Babe, good action and finally a stream quality almost worth of the year 2024. You could actually see something without squinting
Unfortunately calls went down abysmally in her second session after midnight. It was horrible. I don't say that often, but they deserved better last night.
Didn't help that she was told to dress between calls... then Babes tend to stay dressed, because it's annoying to dress and undress over and over again.
Shortly after midnight she wanted to strip even without a caller, but was stopped.
Later she was a bit annoyed by the lack of calls and they corrected and she was nude all the time... and what happened? Calls came to life again. When do they learn?
|
|
11-07-2024 13:07 |
|
meisterlampe1989_2.0
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,500
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
|
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(11-07-2024 21:15 )ManuelM Wrote: their investment.
That's what I am a bit puzzled about.
They were honest for once and admitted that them reducing the quality of the stream was to safe money. Now - all of a sudden - they have the best quality of their whole existence.
So they realised that the quality lately was too horrible even for their standards... so now they have the money to switch to this quality from one day to the other?
Some things don't fit together.
|
|
11-07-2024 21:24 |
|
jorrell
Posting Machine
Posts: 1,016
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
|
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(11-07-2024 21:24 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote: (11-07-2024 21:15 )ManuelM Wrote: their investment.
That's what I am a bit puzzled about.
They were honest for once and admitted that them reducing the quality of the stream was to safe money. Now - all of a sudden - they have the best quality of their whole existence.
So they realised that the quality lately was too horrible even for their standards... so now they have the money to switch to this quality from one day to the other?
Some things don't fit together.
They've have done what I mentioned I would do a while back when the dropped the resolution on satellite to save on production costs. Bandwidth on satellites cost, every single bit of it, so does the maintaining of the transponder, so when they reduced it, I said now they've done this, increase the bitrate of the web stream as the costs are WAY WAY less AND you can give a better resolution you ever could on satellite being limited to SD (HD costs even more)
Appears this is what they have done and i applaud them for making the right choice. increasing the bitrates online is far more efficient than purchasing bandwidth for the Astra satellite (after all this is Murdock were talking about!) In theory their webstream/HLS provider probably has packages tailored for specific bitrate/bandwidth limits and probably already fall within it.
SD channels are dying fast on satellite as many providers are pulling the plug. Online is the future for HD and more and they did they right thing.
Overall, I expect they've saved a good portion of their funding.. What's not to like, from their viewpoint, you spend less and provide more... Thumbs Up from me!
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2024 21:41 by jorrell.)
|
|
11-07-2024 21:27 |
|