RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
6 shows in 14 days.
8 nights off in 14 days equals 57% of days without any live show.
The remaining 6 nights will be covered by 4 different performers: Lilly, Amanda, Sydney, Charlene.
Those 6 shows have 9 time slots in total, two of which will be very limited to approximately 1 or 2 hours.
5 slots for Charlene
1 slot for Amanda
1 slot for Sydney
2 limited slots for Lilly
I am not excluding any breaks from the calculations, and I assume Amanda's and Charlene's shows will last about 7 hours each in total and go from 9pm to 4am. We haven't seen Sydney in quite a while, if memory serves me right she was usually gone by about 2am. Therefore, I assume Sydney's show will go from 9pm to 2am. Lilly will most probably take no breaks so I am including for her into the calculation a total of four hours.
35 hours Charlene
7 hours Amanda
5 hours Sydney
4 hours Lilly
If these numbers are correct, the time frame of 2 weeks will be covered with shows for a total of about 51 hours.
Percentage-wise, this equals:
69% Charlene
14% Amanda
10% Sydney
8% Lilly
(this is 101% in total due to rounding errors).
The channel has gone from 7 days a week to 3 days a week, from shows lasting up to 9 hours to no more than 7 hours, from up to 3 babes in a night to 1 or 2, from trying to have a variety of different performers to basically 70% Charlene, 15% Amanda, and 15% someone else.
I realize that this may come across as me attacking Charlene or Amanda. This is not my intention at all. Numbers are objective, and if my calculations are correct, then these numbers reflect the current situation. It is my opinion that overpresence is a real problem - no matter who it is.
I don't know why Babestation24 decided to have it this way. These may be budgetal decisions. Perhaps Charlene and Amanda have always made the channel the most money. Perhaps Charlene accepts a limited payment as she is allowed to co-stream for her webcam during her home shows. Perhaps they are the most loyal performers and the channel wants to reward them for it. Perhaps they are unable to find other babes who want to work for or with them. Perhaps they are other reasons, I cannot know this.
Now, personally, I am unhappy because for one, none of my favorite babes have been on in quite a long time at this point, and second, I do like it when new performers are brought on as I find it genuinely exciting.
If you are a huge fan of Charlene and Amanda, then I am happy for you as you get a chance to enjoy your favorite performers. And I am happy for Charlene and Amanda as they are given the opportunity to make a living, earn money, to connect with their fans, and to promote, express and show themselves.
I am not trying to paint a black picture, but if this continues, Babestation24 will most likely not have a particularly bright future. The show concept is genius, and I am convinved it still works even in today's day and age. But for it to work reasonable decisions need to be made. Improving the video quality was definitely a huge step in the right direction, so was the decision to - at times - ease up on the artifical censorship, as well as them having a variety of newcomers on the show.
I wish Babestation24 would go back to running shows 6 or 7 nights a week and showing a variety of different performers. I miss Dani, Vicky, Lydia, Mia, Cleo, Lisanne, Alexa, Valerie and some others. I would love to see them again on Babestation24, and I would love to see a variety of newcomers given a chance to show themselves on the channel.
If things don't change then I am at this point simply not part of their target audience. Then it is time for me to leave the channel behind. It is what it is. But I would be disappointed because I have been a fan of the channel for years. I like beautiful women and I know how great and awesome the shows can be.
Time will tell I guess.
Have a wonderful Sunday, everybody!
(This post was last modified: 22-09-2024 09:03 by ManuelM.)
|