Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)

I do try to remain possitive about this service - how many times have I read 'They will be gone by Christmas' yet are still there - but even I am now struggling.

We have seen girls come back after several years away. I'll cite both Vicky Sun and Tyra in this category. They do a few 'banging' shows and then, for little 'obvious' reason suddenly imitate nuns and with shorter working hours. I had 'real' hope for Tyra last night. She started really sexy pre-tittitime yet went downhill from there. She seemed to lack the motivation to perform as we remember her. I am no night-owl so at midnight, after her second break, I left record on with the notion that if I was awake at 5 am(UK) - and often am due to a medical condition with major sleep disturbance - I would come down and stop the recording. Which I did and when I checked it later she had done barely one more hour. Now, I guess, no one can expect a single girl to carry a full shift but this is the recurring pattern now - I do not know what time Charlene finished the night before.

So I ask myself, and have read many opinions about this on here, why are these girls, with an apparent exception of Charlene, are no longer motivated. There could well be both internal and external censorship especially on a tv feed. And you might then ask just why do they continue with that and go web-only. Well I was watching Charlene, who was doing the pre 10pm (UK) shift and it seemed to me that she did not get a single call whereas normally, even at this time, she is quite busy. It may well be a coincidence but the calls only started after the tv feed started - it was 'down' for approx an hour. So my assumption is that the channel needs both. And even if, for financial reasons, they terminated the tv feed to allow more freedom there are other regulations in play, especially in Germany, which would require proof of 'viewer's' age under a log-in system.

So I must assume that money plays a big part in this. Lack of incoming revenue = shorter hours = less money to the girls = lack of motivation = lack of incoming revenue. A never-ending wheel of fortune. Now it may be a case that girls are on an incremental 'wage' - I know that is how ETV worked - the more we earn the more you are paid over a basic sum. That initself could explain Charlene's motivation. Plus of course, for gynological reasons, she can 'get away' with more than others.

Now I latest line of 'discussion' is the new 'studio'. I have already put my hand up inasmuch that I got it a bit wrong - the sofa was the weakest part of my original take. But if this 'studio' is at a remote location, which would go some way to explain use of mobiles, they still require the means to acquire the feed to send it both to the web-server and the sat. upload station. The web picture, as I have mentioned more than once, is slightly different to the tv which has more graphics and commercials. Of course they would hardly pay rent for two locations although in the past they did broadcast from a 'studio' in Berlin in a co-op with a webcam service plus some days in a Gentleman's Club. So they certainly had the means to link calls through their main studio to those.

I'll retire back to my 'cave' now and allow others to chew over this.

Well I did tune in last night and for me if it were a three course meal to go with the stints they did it was, starter 7, main course 1, dessert 1, the night just got worse as it went. As for new studio it look more like someone’s living room!!!

Ooh. I do like that anology to a 3-course meal. A hot starter. An under-cooked main course and a cold pudding.

Of course any meal can be saved with a fine wine except last night only vinegar was served up.

(09-11-2024 11:06 )Jay39 Wrote:  Well I did tune in last night and for me if it were a three course meal to go with the stints they did it was, starter 7, main course 1, dessert 1, the night just got worse as it went. As for new studio it look more like someone’s living room!!!

Knew Tyra was not going to perform same as last time, plus she doesn't seem to be capable of doing a full show. Yes she was there from 21:00-01:00 but including breaks she did 3 hours total again, and now like everyone else, no longer feels the need to go naked. So expect the same tonight. Not even worth a look in is it.

In fact we've no-one left who actually does studio evenings that DOES go naked! Guess they can ditch their 'peep-time' now as its become a poor mans boob show.

Combine that with their new lounge set, its heavily designed around just letting the girls sit and do nothing. Don't expect any good angles or shots anymore because they just don't move around enough

(09-11-2024 10:02 )DB83 Wrote:  There could well be both internal and external censorship especially on a tv feed.

The "external censorship" theory never made any sense, because of the inconsitency. Charlene is showing a lot when she is doing her shows and we had Emma fingering herself while the camera operator zoomed in on it just a few days back.

The current softness is simply due to demotivated Babes, internal teasing tactics and the fact that there are so few Babes left and that there are fewer and shorter shows. With more variety in Babes and longer shows the possibility of something interesting happening would be automatically higher.

A big part of the softness is just laziness, though. The reason gets overlooked often. Some Babes want to (or are told to) dress between every call to tease callers. So it's annoying to dress and undress over and over again.

Some now are not even taking the bra off and rather just slip it aside for a moment.

The moment I saw that Tyra had more complicated clothes, I knew she wouldn't get them off.

What a shock! I think Tyra may be a no show AGAIN! She's a complete waste of time

This is what happens frequently now when you rely heavily on the same four performers, two of which are notorious for cancelling last minute

(Not that they EVER bother to update the schedule because we know they don't communicate with their girls whatsoever)

The highlight of Edita is better than 95% of the shows lately, anyway

Unfortunately it's a pretty short loop.

(09-11-2024 22:15 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  The highlight of Edita is better than 95% of the shows lately, anyway

Unfortunately it's a pretty short loop.

Yeah you notice they keep advertising these 'sexy' clips when the majority of them don't even work there anymore. You don't see them showing repeat clips of how the channel is now though do you?

Like clips of Amanda, Lillian, Tyra or Valerie sat on their arse doing fuck all!

False Advertising mate. Oh and now the stream keeps going offline as well. Nice

(09-11-2024 22:20 )jorrell Wrote:  False Advertising mate

Yeah... that's what I ask myself, too. Their highlight clips are 90% full nudity and pretty hot stuff. So it seems that they know what the majority wants to see... yet, as everybody here knows, it feels like they don't try to do anything to ensure that their shows are constantly on that level.

(09-11-2024 22:25 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  Their highlight clips are 90% full nudity and pretty hot stuff.

yeah remember those days. When nudity was not only a guarantee but most of the night!

They know exactly which clips to show for that reason as you say, so why consistently give us the opposite. Bonkers!

Well that's it for the weekend then. There's 2 hours worth of Lilly next week (if that doesnt get cancelled) the rest we already know isn't worth a damn, just more of the same we had this week, plus Lillian will most likely cancel before then too haha

honestly I hate having to rely on Lilly alone for somethin remotely entertaining even for an hour, but they ain't giving us any choices are they.