Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

Yep if living in the past is a thing then count me in. Guilty as charged. The shows have been getting worse and worse to the point where they are unwatchable and with no desire to bother whatsoever. BS especially.
It's all just a ruthless money grabbing exercise. I can't be bothered with it. Having a good night's sleep wins out. Haven't watched a BS nightshow in a long while. No incentive.

What, not even Atlanta and Beth? On the evidence of how you’ve expressed your satisfaction of their tv output, I don’t believe what you say. At the very least, you atleast mark out their output as worthy of praise above & beyond everybody else on BS.

Personally I completely appreciate a lot of performers on both channels - even if they don’t have a prolific appearance level as compared to others

From time to time I keep an eye on caps and vids threads but the nights of watching and participating live are gone. Beth and Lanta have been worthy of my praise when I have watched them in the past and I would not be surprised if they are still churning out better shows than the rest but for a few months now I just haven't bothered with any BS output. You can believe or not believe whatever you like but nightshows in their present form particularly on BS are just not worth my time. Beth and Lanta will get my custom attention on OF because I know I can trust them.

I wouldn't trust BS with anything.

fair enough. I actually agree with you. I was just, I guess, playing abit of devil’s advocate in challenging your assertion. I thought you’dd be intellectually stimulated by a bit of verbal jousting

(16-11-2024 21:53 )southlondonphil Wrote:  It all went 'wrong' because there isn't much demand for the babe channels traditional product (phone calls) anymore.

I'd say the demand is there, certain babes on BS and XP seem never off the phones. I think it's more of a case, in BS's case anyway, of depreciating the traditional format and herding the sheep into more lucrative scams (sorry services ) that are easier and cheaper to run.

The history of Babestation is a bit different to what you suggest.

They first complained about the decline in phone call revenue in 2013 and again in 2014, although it wasn't until 2015 that they said that online services were being further developed to compensate. Still the demand for phone call services continued to decline and between 2016 and 2017 alone they lost £1m in phone call revenue but only managed to recoup £0.6m through increased internet revenues. In other words, for several years the development of online services was failing to compensate for the continually declining call revenues. On the other hand, the decline in phone call revenue did positively help Babestation in a way, as it pretty much wiped out the TV competition.

As I explained to Thor who wanted to know where all the channels went to, the simple reality is that we have what we have because these days there just isn't enough phone call revenue to sustain more channels.

Hey! Sorry for asking the boring question but was just curious. How are you aware of the gains and losses of the company?

Through their published accounts.

Ah I did think it might have been that but wasn't sure if there was something else out there!

(17-11-2024 13:28 )KerrAvon Wrote:  I'd say the demand is there, certain babes on BS and XP seem never off the phones. I think it's more of a case, in BS's case anyway, of depreciating the traditional format and herding the sheep into more lucrative scams (sorry services ) that are easier and cheaper to run.

There's no way of knowing how busy the phones really are. If, say, they used to average 9 people queuing and 1 talking, and now there's 4 queuing and 1 talking, that's 50% drop in revenue.
But it won't appear any different to the viewer.