Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 25 Vote(s) - 4.32 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)

Author Message
steviebaby Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,564
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 26
Post: #9621
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Yesterday 23:23 )meisterlampe1989_2.0 Wrote:  If you ask yourself what I am always on about with "nice angles". Look at Nessi in this position. That's what I mean.

No pussy, but you can see just enough without the "handclamp".

Yes, the little time I have watched so far, it seems a lot better.

Also, just seen; nice dress and no knickers, very erotic.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 23:50 by steviebaby.)
Yesterday 23:40
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,079
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9622
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Just tuned in quickly to see it looks a little better tonight BUT STILL this main camera is OUT OF FOCUS IS HE BLIND?

i think this camera guy needs to find the Auto Continuous Focus because he sure as hell cant operate it manually> its making my fucking eyes hurt ! Huh
(This post was last modified: Today 00:03 by jorrell.)
Yesterday 23:59
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,561
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9623
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Strong start of Nessi after Peeptime started. But then it cooled down. Lack of calls and not the most inspiring callers, it seems.

And the graphics got in the way again for some moments. bladewave
Today 00:04
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,079
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9624
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
I dunno, the more I try to watch Nessi, the more I'm seeing she a 'one trick pony' and repetitive in her show/movements. Its becoming quite dull Shy
Today 01:14
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,561
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9625
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Today 01:14 )jorrell Wrote:  I dunno, the more I try to watch Nessi, the more I'm seeing she a 'one trick pony' and repetitive in her show/movements. Its becoming quite dull Shy

She has not a lot of calls to go by. I think she is doing very well compared to many other performers.

It's nothing I would freak out about, but it's solid. And solid is still better than most nights.
Today 01:18
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,079
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9626
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
Personally, waggling a phone about while sat on your ass because the calls are low is part of the actual problem. The whole point is to entice viewers, not just provide a caller with something to see, its meant to be a show not a chatline, but i guess IM ASKING TOO MUCH right
(This post was last modified: Today 01:30 by jorrell.)
Today 01:29
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
meisterlampe1989_2.0 Online
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,561
Joined: Mar 2023
Reputation: 2
Post: #9627
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
(Today 01:29 )jorrell Wrote:  but i guess IM ASKING TOO MUCH right

I always said that they need to do more even without someone calling... no, not just because I am a filthy freeloader, but I actually think more people would call without them just sitting around without calls.

But now she even dressed again, so - as usual - they are doing exactly the wrong thing laugh

It's ridiculous at the moment. The only thing missing is a tumbleweed floating through the studio...
Today 01:32
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jorrell Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,079
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 20
Post: #9628
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
This is also part of the problem. They camera operator needs glasses!

This is in focus
[Image: 6xqPMJMO_t.png]

This is not unless your need specsavers Big Laugh
[Image: rKH9eHx2_t.png]
Today 01:37
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
steviebaby Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,564
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 26
Post: #9629
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
You needed bloody binoculars!annoyed
Today 01:57
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ManuelM Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,236
Joined: Sep 2021
Reputation: 5
Post: #9630
RE: Babestation24 - Chat & Discussion (No Requests in this thread)
It really is no surprise that the number of calls is very low at this point. Since early August last year the channel has minimized pretty much everything down and became incredibly redundant and repetitive. For the majority of the time it was basically Charlene several times per week, Amanda once per week, and some other shows here and there. It almost seemed like everybody else other than Amanda and Charlene - with the exception of Lillian - was basically considered no more than a gap filler for the channel. There was very little variety and there were many reasons to be disappointed in how things were going.

Those viewers and customers who are not hardcore fans of Amanda and Charlene will for the most part have simply stopped following the channel. There was absolutely no change in sight for basically half a year.

Now the schedule is starting to look more promising as there is finally again some variety. But it will take a long time and a large number of truly great shows to re-build the following the channel once had. The question is whether the channel genuinely wants to offer variety - a larger number of different babes, going back to studio shows for the most part with up to three performers per night, stopping the artificial censorship, paying close attention to good camera work and innovation, and so on, and so forth. Do they really want this? Well, this is a business and it would, I think, be the reasonable approach to do this. But personally, I have the feeling things will not change substantially.

Personally, I am disappointed that Vicky's comeback didn't last very long, that Lydia never became a regular feature on the channel, that Dani was truly free to perform for one night only and then seemed for the most part genuinely unhappy for the few remaining shows she has had. I miss Lisanne, and I would really like to see Alexa, Cleo, Leni and some others on the channel again.
Today 07:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply