Ladyboy alert!

(13-11-2009 01:56 )funkymackem Wrote:  

(13-11-2009 01:22 )muttley Wrote:  Like they had ladyboys other night nothing on Asian connections wrong with ladyboys as i shagged one for free Bangkok Thailand last year

u said that out loud u know mate lol

It's okay 'cos I didn't understand a fucking word of it

Come on, Hof! Get back on here and explain yourself. It's beginning to offend me now!

Ladyboys have to make a living to you know sry about that comment as I had a few ciders, and yes ladyboys are a mystical person

there was a ladyboy on last night, natalie or something i think she was called?

she was really good looking i thought, much better than half the girls on the other channels anyway.

(25-11-2009 14:23 )ringo78 Wrote:  there was a ladyboy on last night, natalie or something i think she was called?

she was really good looking i thought, much better than half the girls on the other channels anyway.

What do you mean she?

Don't get me fucking started on this atrosity again. I see Hof's not showing his face anymore!!? Just as well the mouthfull I'd be giving him.

It's just not right. I don't want to see these fucking freaks on my television - especially when they appear without warning.

(13-11-2009 01:22 )muttley Wrote:  Like they had ladyboys other night nothing on Asian connections wrong with ladyboys as i shagged one for free Bangkok Thailand last year

Let's re-phrase that. You mean you shagged another poof

lol... what year is this?

censorship is slowly being done away with and replaced by money and the satisfaction of demand. we should be grateful for that attitude too cos otherwise there would be no babe channels or no girls pushing boundaries with thongs etc.

personally i've no interest in phoning a shemale but she was never off the phone last night so obviously theres a big demand.

(25-11-2009 15:45 )ringo78 Wrote:  personally i've no interest in phoning a shemale but she was never off the phone last night so obviously theres a big demand.

So why don't babeworld set up a dedicated gay channel so that we don't have to put up with them on the (supposedly) straight channels?

(25-11-2009 16:10 )StanTheMan Wrote:  

(25-11-2009 15:45 )ringo78 Wrote:  personally i've no interest in phoning a shemale but she was never off the phone last night so obviously theres a big demand.

So why don't babeworld set up a dedicated gay channel so that we don't have to put up with them on the (supposedly) straight channels?

Well it's my guess...and I could be wrong...but the majority of takers for ladyboys would be men who identified as "straight" or "bisexual", rather than "gay". I know my gay son certainly wouldn't be interested in ladyboys.....he wants a man who looks like a man. So marketing ladyboys to a gay audience probably isn't going to be very popular.

My wife and I often check Asian babes to see if we can see adam's apples or bulges in knickers...sometimes 2 out of the 3 "girls" are "boys"

(26-11-2009 16:08 )RussG Wrote:  My wife and I often check Asian babes to see if we can see adam's apples or bulges in knickers...sometimes 2 out of the 3 "girls" are "boys"

Correct, but you know what? I'm just not bothered anymore. It's now just a channel I avoid. It's hof's loss. He's the one losing viewers.

Before I saw this thread I had seen Asian Babes a few times, and thought I'd spotted a ladyboy, and seems like I was right lol.

The saying goes, If they look to good to be true they're a ladyboy.
But to be fair when the girl was on the mic the other night she Introduced her friend as a ladyboy, I can see why they would employ them, ladyboys are usually less shy and there are many stunnas.

It's not like your actually shagging a ladyboy, so whats the big deal?