(08-12-2009 16:03 )Josh Wrote: People see and hear what they want and are selective in what they show. I do it while making babe vids. I cut out the boring bits.
I expected that kind of response from Nigma. Lets all look at the vids and see the context in what Amber actually said and not just what Nigma has quoted her as saying.
In vid 1, At the end of Amber's denial at showing her nipple, she did say "Not yet anyway".
Amber herself can answer why in vid 2. She said that if she does a night show, she will get them out. That means on a bed and not presenting, As the sexy redhead Kelly points out. Nigma must have missed this part while viewing his recording.
Context you say?.. now this will be fun.
So, let's get the context right:
The second vid occurred before the first vid (nice ordering btw Josh.. very cute when arguing context) and after repeated statements of "later", "it's too early" and "I'm going to be here until midnight so there's a lot of things that can happen between now and then". It was subsequently followed by several more ambiguous statments and the aforementioned "not yet, anyway" with Ella in vid one.
So.. "clear" no's in that she continued to contradict herself, both immediately after the answer, and by following with subsequent contradictory comments running right up to the end of her shift.
Basically you're arguing that the statements you're posting with immediate contradictions are "clear", have clear meaning and are explicit, yet the other contrary statements not accompanied by contradictions are not clear and should not be taken in context or any meaning inferred from them
Let's recap..
(08-12-2009 16:03 )Josh Wrote: People see and hear what they want and are selective in what they show
Yep, you've proven yourself right there.
...
No, on the matter of context, I'm pretty much willing to wager that the reason you and others are clinging onto those two "clear" comments and skipping every other one that night including the ones I've quoted is not because you haven't seen them. Rather I'd wager it's because putting the clips you're posting into the actual context of what she said during the night, the ambiguity and continued implication of her doing more (before, between and after the clips you're clinging to) doesn't do the argument for "clarity" and "denial" any good. In regard to accusing me of selective quoting and quoting out of context is actually quite delicious.
If you do manage to get the full recording working, skip to around the last 30 minutes and look for the navy response. It's actually quite clear and, like many of the quotes I've posted, isn't immediately followed by a contradictory statment. Unlike your quoted videos. I wonder why?